nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Personalization and Individual Differences in Business Data Analytics

verfasst von : Christos Amyrotos, Panayiotis Andreou, Panagiotis Germanakos, Irene Polycarpou

Erschienen in: A Human-Centered Perspective of Intelligent Personalized Environments and Systems

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Today’s data-driven business environment necessitates the adoption of business intelligence and analytics (BI &A) platforms for companies that want to remain competitive or even survive in the global market. On the other hand, as the volume and variety of data grow, the ability to quickly analyze data and reach actionable decisions becomes more complex. In response, BI &A vendors have developed features, to assist users with data exploration, analysis, and delivery of on-demand timely business insights using interactive data visualizations. These tools also enable non-expert analysts, such as directors, to quickly translate data into actionable items. However, the large variety of tools and data visualizations may become overwhelming and diminish the end users’ ability to quickly reach a decision. Furthermore, BI &A vendors adopt the on-size-fits-all approach, delivering the same output to all users for identical requests, neglecting to incorporate their unique characteristics and personalize their interaction. This chapter presents the user adaptation and personalization techniques employed by leading BI &A enterprise solutions, and discusses the effect of individual differences in understanding and processing data visualizations. Our goal is to explore opportunities and challenges of incorporating individual differences in the visual analytics process, and highlight the necessity of a human-centered model in BI &A platforms.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Transparent Music Preference Modeling and Recommendation with a Model of Human Memory Theory

Nächstes Kapitel Inferring Eudaimonia and Hedonia from Digital Traces

https://www.gartner.com/en.

https://looker.com/.

https://www.tibco.com/.

https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/.

https://www.microstrategy.com/us/product/analytics.

https://www.thoughtspot.com/.

https://www.sisense.com/.

https://www.teradata.com/.

https://rapidminer.com/.

Oracle Real-Time Integration Business Insight, https://docs.oracle.com/middleware/12212/insight/insight-concepts/GUID-71C68489-7DCC-4CD2-B7FC-E444436327DF.htm.

Microsoft Inclusive Design, https://inclusive.microsoft.design/.

https://www.tableau.com/.

https://www.oracle.com/business-analytics/day-by-day.html.

https://www.qlik.com/us/products/qlik-sense.

https://www.oracle.com/business-analytics/day-by-day.html.

Allen B (2000) Individual differences and the conundrums of user-centered design: Two experiments. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 51(6):508–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:63.0.CO;2-Q

Allport GW (1937) Personality: a psychological interpretation. Holt

Allport GW (1961) Pattern and growth in personality. Holt, Reinhart, Winston

Amyrotos C, Andreou P, Germanakos P (2021) Human-centred persona driven personalization in business data analytics. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 29th ACM conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, UMAP ’21. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450614.3462241

Aronen E, Vuontela V, Steenari MR, Salmi J, Carlson S (2005) Working memory, psychiatric symptoms, and academic performance at school. Neurobiol Learn Mem 83(1):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.010

Baddeley AD, Hitch G (1974) Working memory. In: Bower GH (ed) Psychology of learning and motivation, psychology of learning and motivation, vol 8. Academic, pp 47–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1

Balint L (1995) Adaptive interfaces for human-computer interaction: a colorful spectrum of present and future options. In: 1995 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. intelligent systems for the 21st century, vol. 1. IEEE, pp 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1995.537774

Behrisch M, Streeb D, Stoffel F, Seebacher D, Matejek B, Weber SH, Mittelstädt S, Pfister H, Keim D (2019) Commercial visual analytics systems-advances in the big data analytics field. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 25(10):3011–3031. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2859973

Cacioppo J, Petty R (1982) The need for cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 42(1):116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116

10.

Capon A, Handley S, Dennis I (2003) Working memory and reasoning: An individual differences perspective. Think Reason 9(3):203–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546781343000222

11.

Carenini G, Conati C, Hoque E, Steichen B, Toker D, Enns J (2014) Highlighting interventions and user differences: informing adaptive information visualization support. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI, CHI ’14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 1835–1844. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557141

12.

Chen C (2000) Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 51(6):529–542

13.

Chen C, Czerwinski M (1997) Spatial ability and visual navigation: an empirical study. New Rev Hypermedia Multimed 3(1):67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614569708914684

14.

Conati C, Maclaren H (2008) Exploring the role of individual differences in information visualization. In: Proceedings of AVI, AVI ’08. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/1385569.1385602

15.

Coyle CL, Hogan R, Powell R (2020) SAS global forum 2020: that’s how i like it: personalize reports in SAS® visual analytics apps for iOS, Android, and Microsoft Windows 10. Available via SAS. https://www.sas.com/content/dam/SAS/support/en/sas-global-forum-proceedings/2020/4427-2020.pdf Cited 07 Feb 2021

16.

Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harman HH, Dermen D (1976) Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Available via ETC. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/Manual_for_Kit_of_Factor-Referenced_Cognitive_Tests.pdf. Cited 26 Mar 2021

17.

Engle RW, Carullo JJ, Collins KW (1991) Individual differences in working memory for comprehension and following directions. J Educ Res 84(5):253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1991.10886025

18.

Gartner (2020) Magic quadrant for analytics and business intelligence platforms for 2020. Available via GARTNER. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3980852/magic-quadrant-for-analytics-and-business-intelligence-p. Cited 26 Jan 2021

19.

Germanakos P, Lekkas Z, Amyrotos C, Andreou P (2021) Proposing a perceived expertise tool in business data analytics. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 29th ACM conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, UMAP ’21. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450614.3462236

20.

Gilligan KA, Flouri E, Farran EK (2017) The contribution of spatial ability to mathematics achievement in middle childhood. J Exp Child Psychol 163:107–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.016

21.

Goldberg LR (1993) The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am Psychol 48(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26

22.

Gottfredson LS (1997) Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence 24(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8

23.

Green TM, Fisher B (2010) Towards the personal equation of interaction: the impact of personality factors on visual analytics interface interaction. In: Proceedings of VAST. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, pp 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2010.5653587

24.

Henschen D (2019) Tableau advances the era of smart analytics. Available via TABLEAU. https://www.tableau.com/learn/whitepapers/tableau-advances-smart-analytics. Cited 10 Feb 2021

25.

Hinson J, Jameson T, Whitney P (2003) Impulsive decision making and working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29(2):298–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.298

26.

Hopkins B (2019) The forester wave: enterprise insight platforms, Q1 2019. Available via IBM. https://www-2000.ibm.com/partnerworld/compintelligence/ TheForresterWaveEnterpriseInsightPlatforms Q12019.pdf. Cited 27 Jan 2021

27.

Howard TW (2015) Are personas really usable? Commun Des Q Rev 3(2):20–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2752853.2752856

28.

Imhoff C, White C (2011) Self-service business intelligence empowering users to generate insights. Available via BITPIPE. http://docs.media.bitpipe.com/io_10x/io_106625/item_583281/TDWI_Best_Practices_Report_Self-Service_BI_Q311%5B1%5D.pdf. Cited 26 Jan 2021

29.

Johnson D, Huibers P (2019) Is self-service analytics sustainable?. Available via TERADATA. https://www.teradata.com/Blogs/Is-Self-Service-Analytics-Sustainable. Cited 08 Feb 2021

30.

Kerren A, Schreiber F (2012) Toward the role of interaction in visual analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2012 winter simulation conference (WSC). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2012.6465208

31.

Koć-Januchta M, Höffler T, Thoma GB, Prechtl H, Leutner D (2017) Visualizers versus verbalizers: effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures—an eye-tracking study. Comput Human Behav 68:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028CrossRef

32.

Lallé S, Conati C, Carenini G (2017) Impact of individual differences on user experience with a real-world visualization interface for public engagement. In: Proceedings UMAP. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 369–370. https://doi.org/10.1145/3079628.3079634

33.

Lee S, Kim S, Hung Y, Lam H, Kang Y, Yi JS (2016) How do people make sense of unfamiliar visualizations?: a grounded model of novice’s information visualization sensemaking. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 22(1):499–508. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467195

34.

Liu S, Cui W, Wu Y, Liu M (2014) A survey on information visualization: recent advances and challenges. Vis Comput 30(12):1373–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-013-0892-3

35.

Liu Z, Crouser RJ, Ottley A (2020) Survey on individual differences in visualization. Comput Graph Forum 39(3):693–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14033

36.

Mather N, Wendling BJ (2005) Linking cognitive assessment results to academic interventions for students with learning disabilities. In: Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues. The Guilford Press, pp 269–294

37.

Mawad F, TrÍas M, Giménez A, Maiche A, Ares G (2015) Influence of cognitive style on information processing and selection of yogurt labels: Insights from an eye-tracking study. Food Res Int 74:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.023

38.

Messick S (1984) The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice. Educ Psychol 19(2):59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529283

39.

Microsoft (2020) Let users personalize visuals in a report. Available via MICROSOFT. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/create-reports/power-bi-personalize-visuals Cited 06 Feb 2021

40.

Negash S (2004) Business intelligence. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 13:177–195. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01315

41.

Pazzani MJ (1999) A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artif Intell Rev 13:393–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006544522159

42.

Qlik (2018) Qlik Showcases Innovation for the Data-Driven Enterprise. Available via QLIK. https://www.qlik.com/us/company/press-room/press-releases/0424-qlik-showcases-innovation-for-the-data-driven-enterprise. Cited 17 Feb 2021

43.

Qlik, Deeper Insights and Data-driven Decisions Through AI. Available via QLIK. https://www.qlik.com/us/-/media/files/resource-library/global-us/direct/datasheets/ds-augmented-intelligence-en.pdf. Cited 20 Feb 2021

44.

Ridgers M (2020) How natural language processing is changing data analytics. Available via KDNUGGETS. https://www.kdnuggets.com/2020/08/natural-language-processing-changing-data-analytics.html. Cited 23 Feb 2021

45.

Riding R, Cheema I (1991) Cognitive styles-an overview and integration. Educ Psychol 11(3–4):193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110301

46.

Riding R, Douglas G (1993) The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. Br J Educ Psychol 63(2):297–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01059.x

47.

Rotter JB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr 80(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976

48.

SAP (2013) Personalization in SAP Business Intelligence 4.0 Web Intelligence Publications. Available via SAP. https://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/Personalization+in+SAP+Business+Intelligence+4.0+Web+Intelligence+Publications. Cited 20 Feb 2021

49.

Schrage M (2013) How the big data explosion has changed decision making. Available via HBR. https://hbr.org/2016/08/how-the-big-data-explosion-has-changed-decision-making. Cited 20 Jan 2021

50.

Smyth B (2007) Case-based recommendation. Springer, Berlin, pp 342–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_11

51.

Steichen B, Carenini G, Conati C (2013) User-adaptive information visualization: using eye gaze data to infer visualization tasks and user cognitive abilities. In: Proceedings IUI, IUI ’13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449439

52.

Steichen B, Fu B (2019) Towards adaptive information visualization—a study of information visualization aids and the role of user cognitive style. Front Artif Intell 2:22. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2019.00022

53.

Steichen B, Fu B, Nguyen T (2020) Inferring cognitive style from eye gaze behavior during information visualization usage. In: Proceedings of UMAP, UMAP ’20. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340631.3394881

54.

Suzuki WA (2005) Associative learning and the hippocampus. Available via APA. https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2005/02/suzuki. Cited 20 Mar 2021

55.

ThoughtSpot (2021) Use SearchIQ. Available via THOUGHTSPOT. https://docs.thoughtspot.com/latest/end-user/search/use-searchiq.html. Cited 23 Mar 2021

56.

Toker D, Conati C, Carenini G, Haraty M (2012) Towards adaptive information visualization: on the influence of user characteristics. In: Masthoff J, Mobasher B, Desmarais MC, Nkambou R (eds) Proceedings of UMAP. Springer, Berlin, pp 274–285

57.

Toker D, Conati C, Steichen B, Carenini G (2013) Individual user characteristics and information visualization: connecting the dots through eye tracking. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI, CHI ’13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470696

58.

Tsianos N, Germanakos P, Lekkas Z, Mourlas C, Samaras G (2009) Eye-tracking users’ behavior in relation to cognitive style within an e-learning environment. In: Proceedings of ICALT. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, pp 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2009.110

59.

Velez MC, Silver D, Tremaine M (2005) Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences. In: Proceedings of IEEE VIS. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, pp 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2005.1532836

60.

Vogel E, Woodman G, Luck S (2001) Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(1):92–114. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.27.1.92

61.

Wai J, Lubinski D, Benbow C (2009) Spatial ability for stem domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol 101:817–835CrossRef

62.

Yelizarov A, Gamayunov D (2014) Adaptive visualization interface that manages user’s cognitive load based on interaction characteristics. In: Proceedings of VINCI, VINCI ’14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2636240.2636844

63.

Zhang L, Stoffel A, Behrisch M, Mittelstadt S, Schreck T, Pompl R, Weber S, Last H, Keim D (2012) Visual analytics for the big data era—a comparative review of state-of-the-art commercial systems. In: Proceedings of VAST. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, pp 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2012.6400554

64.

Zhang LF (2004) Field-dependence/independence: cognitive style or perceptual ability?-validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Pers Individ Dif 37(6):1295–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.015

65.

Ziemkiewicz C, Crouser RJ, Yauilla AR, Su SL, Ribarsky W, Chang R (2011) How locus of control influences compatibility with visualization style. In: Proceedings of IEEE VAST. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, pp 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2011.6102445

66.

Ziemkiewicz C, Kosara R (2009) Preconceptions and individual differences in understanding visual metaphors. Comput Graph Forum 28(3):911–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01442.x

Titel: Personalization and Individual Differences in Business Data Analytics
verfasst von: Christos Amyrotos
Panayiotis Andreou
Panagiotis Germanakos
Irene Polycarpou
Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland
Buch: A Human-Centered Perspective of Intelligent Personalized Environments and Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55108-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-55109-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55109-3_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"