nach oben

Transportation

10.05.2024

Understanding social attitudes towards autonomous driving: a perspective from Chinese citizens

verfasst von: Zhenning Li, Ruru Tang, Guofa Li, Chengzhong Xu

Erschienen in: Transportation

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Given the rapid advancement of autonomous driving technology, discerning public willingness to pay and anticipated driving behavior for autonomous vehicles is crucial for their successful promotion, hastened adoption, and enhanced safety in forthcoming mixed autonomy traffic scenarios. This study employs a comprehensive online survey to scrutinize the factors influencing these objectives, encompassing socioeconomic and demographic elements, driving experience, and attitudes towards autonomous vehicles. Leveraging a sophisticated discrete choice model-the mixed logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances-this analysis unveils significant impacts of public social attitudes towards autonomous vehicles and current driving behavior on their willingness to pay for and behavior around autonomous vehicles. This paper’s contributions span theoretical modeling, experimental design, and estimation outcomes, offering valuable insights for policymakers and automobile manufacturers.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Li, Z., Wu, Q., Yu, H., Chen, C., Zhang, G., Tian, Z.Z., Prevedouros, P.D.: Temporal-spatial dimension extension-based intersection control formulation for connected and autonomous vehicle systems. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 104, 234–248 (2019)CrossRef

Liao, H., Li, Z., Shen, H., Zeng, W., Liao, D., Li, G., Li, S.E., Xu, C.: Bat: Behavior-aware human-like trajectory prediction for autonomous driving (2023). arXiv:2312.06371

Committee, S.O.-R.A.V.S., et al.: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE Standard J. 3016, 1–16 (2021)

Kalra, N., Paddock, S.M.: Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transp. Res. Part A: Pol. Pract. 94, 182–193 (2016)

Litman, T.: Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions. Victoria Transport Policy Institute Victoria, Canada (2017)

Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Li, K.: Smoothing traffic flow via control of autonomous vehicles. IEEE Int. Things J. 7(5), 3882–3896 (2020)CrossRef

Bigman, Y.E., Gray, K.: Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles. Nature 579(7797), E1–E2 (2020)CrossRef

Das, S., Dutta, A., Lindheimer, T., Jalayer, M., Elgart, Z.: Youtube as a source of information in understanding autonomous vehicle consumers: natural language processing study. Trans. Res. Record 2673(8), 242–253 (2019)CrossRef

Talebian, A., Mishra, S.: Predicting the adoption of connected autonomous vehicles: A new approach based on the theory of diffusion of innovations. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 95, 363–380 (2018)CrossRef

Harb, M., Xiao, Y., Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P.L., Walker, J.L.: Projecting travelers into a world of self-driving vehicles: estimating travel behavior implications via a naturalistic experiment. Transportation 45(6), 1671–1685 (2018)CrossRef

Nair, G.S., Bhat, C.R.: Sharing the road with autonomous vehicles: Perceived safety and regulatory preferences. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 122, 102885 (2021)CrossRef

Asmussen, K.E., Mondal, A., Bhat, C.R.: Adoption of partially automated vehicle technology features and impacts on vehicle miles of travel (vmt). Trans. Res. Part A: Pol. Pract. 158, 156–179 (2022)

Yuan, Q., Peng, Y., Xu, X., Wang, X.: Key points of investigation and analysis on traffic accidents involving intelligent vehicles. Transp. Saf. Environ.3(4) tdab020 (2021)

Cohen, S.A., Hopkins, D.: Autonomous vehicles and the future of urban tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 74, 33–42 (2019)CrossRef

Jelinski, L., Etzrodt, K., Engesser, S.: Undifferentiated optimism and scandalized accidents: the media coverage of autonomous driving in germany. J. Sci. Commun. 20(4), A02 (2021)CrossRef

Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., Rahwan, I.: Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1(10), 694–696 (2017)CrossRef

Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Liu, P.: What drives people to accept automated vehicles? findings from a field experiment. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 95, 320–334 (2018)CrossRef

Mohamed, M., Bromfield, N.F.: Attitudes, driving behavior, and accident involvement among young male drivers in saudi arabia. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 47, 59–71 (2017)CrossRef

Hassen, A., Godesso, A., Abebe, L., Girma, E.: Risky driving behaviors for road traffic accident among drivers in mekele city, northern ethiopia. BMC Res. Notes 4(1), 1–6 (2011)CrossRef

Atombo, C., Wu, C., Tettehfio, E.O., Agbo, A.A.: Personality, socioeconomic status, attitude, intention and risky driving behavior. Cogent Psychol. 4(1), 1376424 (2017)CrossRef

Li, Z., Chen, Z., Li, Y., Xu, C.: Context-aware trajectory prediction for autonomous driving in heterogeneous environments. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 39(1), 120–135 (2024)

Liao, H., Shen, H., Li, Z., Wang, C., Li, G., Bie, Y., Xu, C.: Gpt-4 enhanced multimodal grounding for autonomous driving: Leveraging cross-modal attention with large language models (2023). arXiv:2312.03543

Hohenberger, C., Spörrle, M., Welpe, I.M.: Not fearless, but self-enhanced: The effects of anxiety on the willingness to use autonomous cars depend on individual levels of self-enhancement. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 116, 40–52 (2017)CrossRef

Rahimi, A., Azimi, G., Asgari, H., Jin, X.: Adoption and willingness to pay for autonomous vehicles: attitudes and latent classes. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 89, 102611 (2020)

Haboucha, C.J., Ishaq, R., Shiftan, Y.: User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 78, 37–49 (2017)CrossRef

Liu, P., Guo, Q., Ren, F., Wang, L., Xu, Z.: Willingness to pay for self-driving vehicles: Influences of demographic and psychological factors. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 100, 306–317 (2019)CrossRef

Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in china, india, japan, the us, the uk, and australia. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Tech. rep. (2014)

Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., de Winter, J.C.: Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 32, 127–140 (2015)CrossRef

Anania, E.C., Rice, S., Walters, N.W., Pierce, M., Winter, S.R., Milner, M.N.: The effects of positive and negative information on consumers’ willingness to ride in a driverless vehicle. Trans. Pol. 72, 218–224 (2018)CrossRef

Acheampong, R.A., Cugurullo, F.: Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62, 349–375 (2019)CrossRef

Bernhard, C., Oberfeld, D., Hoffmann, C., Weismüller, D., Hecht, H.: User acceptance of automated public transport: Valence of an autonomous minibus experience. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 70, 109–123 (2020)CrossRef

Nastjuk, I., Herrenkind, B., Marrone, M., Brendel, A.B., Kolbe, L.M.: What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? an investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user’s perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 161, 120319 (2020)CrossRef

Morita, T., Managi, S.: Autonomous vehicles: Willingness to pay and the social dilemma. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 119, 102748 (2020)CrossRef

Liljamo, T., Liimatainen, H., Pöllänen, M.: Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 59, 24–44 (2018)CrossRef

Gkartzonikas, C., Gkritza, K.: What have we learned? a review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 98, 323–337 (2019)CrossRef

Thurner, T., Fursov, K., Nefedova, A.: Early adopters of new transportation technologies: Attitudes of russia’ population towards car sharing, the electric car and autonomous driving. Transp. Res. Part A Pol. Pract. 155, 403–417 (2022)CrossRef

Dos Santos, F.L.M., Duboz, A., Grosso, M., Raposo, M.A., Krause, J., Mourtzouchou, A., Balahur, A., Ciuffo, B.: An acceptance divergence? media, citizens and policy perspectives on autonomous cars in the european union. Transp. Res. Part A Pol. Pract. 158, 224–238 (2022)CrossRef

Goldbach, C., Sickmann, J., Pitz, T., Zimasa, T.: Towards autonomous public transportation: Attitudes and intentions of the local population. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 13, 100504 (2022)

Shin, J., Bhat, C.R., You, D., Garikapati, V.M., Pendyala, R.M.: Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for advanced vehicle technology options and fuel types. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 60, 511–524 (2015)CrossRef

Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Wang, W.: Capturing ownership behavior of autonomous vehicles in japan based on a stated preference survey and a mixed logit model with repeated choices. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 13(10), 788–801 (2019)CrossRef

Shabanpour, R., Mousavi, S.N.D., Golshani, N., Auld, J., Mohammadian, A.: Consumer preferences of electric and automated vehicles, in: 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), IEEE, pp. 716–720 (2017)

Shabanpour, R., Golshani, N., Shamshiripour, A., Mohammadian, A.K.: Eliciting preferences for adoption of fully automated vehicles using best-worst analysis. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. 93, 463–478 (2018)

Yap, M., Correia, G., van Arem, B.: Valuation of travel attributes for using automated vehicles as egress transport of multimodal train trips. Transp. Res. Procedia 10, 462–471 (2015)CrossRef

McFadden, D., Train, K.: Mixed mnl models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econom. 15(5), 447–470 (2000)CrossRef

Li, Z., Ci, Y., Chen, C., Zhang, G., Wu, Q., Qian, Z.S., Prevedouros, P.D., Ma, D.T.: Investigation of driver injury severities in rural single-vehicle crashes under rain conditions using mixed logit and latent class models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 124, 219–229 (2019a)CrossRef

Li, Z., Wu, Q., Ci, Y., Chen, C., Chen, X., Zhang, G.: Using latent class analysis and mixed logit model to explore risk factors on driver injury severity in single-vehicle crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 129, 230–240 (2019b)CrossRef

Wali, B., Khattak, A.J.: Harnessing ambient sensing & naturalistic driving systems to understand links between driving volatility and crash propensity in school zones-a generalized hierarchical mixed logit framework. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 114, 405–424 (2020)CrossRef

Behnood, A., Haghani, M., Golafshani, E.M.: Determinants of purchase likelihood for partially and fully automated vehicles: Insights from mixed logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances. Transp. Res. Part A Pol. Pract. 159, 119–139 (2022)CrossRef

Krueger, R., Rashidi, T.H., Rose, J.M.: Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 69, 343–355 (2016)CrossRef

Daziano, R.A., Sarrias, M., Leard, B.: Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? analyzing response to autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 78, 150–164 (2017)CrossRef

Miles, D.E., Johnson, G.L.: Aggressive driving behaviors: are there psychological and attitudinal predictors? Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 6(2), 147–161 (2003)CrossRef

Măirean, C., Havârneanu, C.-E.: The relationship between drivers’ illusion of superiority, aggressive driving, and self-reported risky driving behaviors. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 55, 167–174 (2018)CrossRef

Abou Elassad, Z.E,. Mousannif, H., Al Moatassime, H., Karkouch, A.: The application of machine learning techniques for driving behavior analysis: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87, 103312 (2020)

Fountas, G., Pantangi, S.S., Hulme, K.F., Anastasopoulos, P.C.: The effects of driver fatigue, gender, and distracted driving on perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior: A correlated grouped random parameters bivariate probit approach. Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 22, 100091 (2019)

Siegrist, M.: A causal model explaining the perception and acceptance of gene technology 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29(10), 2093–2106 (1999)CrossRef

Clark, M.S., Von Culin, K.R., Clark-Polner, E., Lemay, E.P., Jr.: Accuracy and projection in perceptions of partners’ recent emotional experiences: Both minds matter. Emotion 17(2) 196 (2017)

Krahé, B., Fenske, I.: Predicting aggressive driving behavior: The role of macho personality, age, and power of car. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression 28(1), 21–29 (2002)CrossRef

Galassi, M., Davies, J., Theiler, J., Gough, B., Jungman, G., Alken, P., Booth, M., Rossi, F., Ulerich, R.: GNU scientific library, Network Theory Limited (2002)

Li, Z., Liao, H., Tang, R., Li, G., Li, Y., Xu, C.: Mitigating the impact of outliers in traffic crash analysis: A robust bayesian regression approach with application to tunnel crash data. Accid. Anal. Prev. 185, 107019 (2023)CrossRef

Li, Z., Wang, C., Liao, H., Li, G., Xu, C.: Efficient and robust estimation of single-vehicle crash severity: A mixed logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances. Accid. Anal. Prev. 196, 107446 (2024)CrossRef

Cartenì, A.: The acceptability value of autonomous vehicles: A quantitative analysis of the willingness to pay for shared autonomous vehicles (savs) mobility services. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 8, 100224 (2020)CrossRef

Payre, W., Cestac, J., Delhomme, P.: Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27, 252–263 (2014)CrossRef

Megens, I.I., Schaefer, W.W., van der Waerden, P.P., Masselink, P.P.: Vehicle users’preferences concerning automated driving implications for transportation and market planning, Exploring Energy Neutral Development KenW 2 iBrabant part 4, 99 (2015)

Menon, N., Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., Pinjari, A.R., Mannering, F.: Shared autonomous vehicles and their potential impacts on household vehicle ownership: An exploratory empirical assessment. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 13(2), 111–122 (2019)CrossRef

Howard, D., Dai, D.: Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of berkeley, california, in: Transportation research board 93rd annual meeting, vol. 14, pp. 1–16 (2014)

Wadud, Z.: Fully automated vehicles: A cost of ownership analysis to inform early adoption. Transp. Res. Part A Pol. Pract. 101, 163–176 (2017)CrossRef

Qu, W., Xu, J., Ge, Y., Sun, X., Zhang, K.: Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess public receptivity toward autonomous vehicles and its relation with the traffic safety climate in china. Accid. Anal. Prev. 128, 78–86 (2019)CrossRef

Reimer, B.: Driver assistance systems and the transition to automated vehicles: A path to increase older adult safety and mobility? Public Policy Aging Rep. 24(1), 27–31 (2014)CrossRef

Hagl, M., Kouabenan, D.R.: Safe on the road-does advanced driver-assistance systems use affect road risk perception? Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 73, 488–498 (2020)CrossRef

Ma, Z., Zhang, Y.: Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver’s driving styles. Accid. Anal. Prev. 159, 106238 (2021)CrossRef

Payre, W., Cestac, J., Delhomme, P.: Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27, 252–263 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009CrossRef

Weigl, K., Nees, M.A., Eisele, D., Riener, A.: Acceptance of automated vehicles: Gender effects, but lack of meaningful association with desire for control in Germany and in the U.S., Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 13, 100563 (2022) . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100563

Moody, J., Bailey, N., Zhao, J.: Public perceptions of autonomous vehicle safety: An international comparison. Safety Sci. 121, 634–650 (2020)CrossRef

Scott-Parker, B., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O.: Young driver risky behaviour and predictors of crash risk in australia, new zealand and colombia: Same but different? Accid. Anal. Prev. 99, 30–38 (2017)CrossRef

Veselska, Z., Madarasova Geckova, A., Gajdosova, B., Orosova, O. van Dijk, J.P., Reijneveld, S.A.: Socio-economic differences in self-esteem of adolescents influenced by personality, mental health and social support. Eur. J. Public Health 20(6) 647–652 (2010)

Dursun, B., Cesur, R., Mocan, N.: The impact of education on health outcomes and behaviors in a middle-income, low-education country. Econ. Hum. Biol. 31, 94–114 (2018)CrossRef

Soliman, A., Alhajyaseen, W., Alfar, R., Alkaabi, I.: Changes in driving behavior across age cohorts in an arab culture: the case of state of qatar. Procedia Comput. Sci. 130, 652–659 (2018)

Pantangi, S.S., Fountas, G., Anastasopoulos, P.C., Pierowicz, J., Majka, K., Blatt, A.: Do high visibility enforcement programs affect aggressive driving behavior? an empirical analysis using naturalistic driving study data. Accid. Anal. Prev. 138, 105361 (2020)CrossRef

Vaughn, M.G., Define, R.S., DeLisi, M., Perron, B.E., Beaver, K.M., Fu, Q., Howard, M.O.: Sociodemographic, behavioral, and substance use correlates of reckless driving in the united states: Findings from a national sample. J. Psychiatr. Res. 45(3), 347–353 (2011)CrossRef

Cox, J.A., Beanland, V., Filtness, A.J.: Risk and safety perception on urban and rural roads: Effects of environmental features, driver age and risk sensitivity. Traffic Inj. Prev. 18(7), 703–710 (2017)CrossRef

Sani, S.R.H., Tabibi, Z., Fadardi, J.S., Stavrinos, D.: Aggression, emotional self-regulation, attentional bias, and cognitive inhibition predict risky driving behavior. Accid. Anal. Prev. 109, 78–88 (2017)CrossRef

Titel: Understanding social attitudes towards autonomous driving: a perspective from Chinese citizens
verfasst von: Zhenning Li
Ruru Tang
Guofa Li
Chengzhong Xu
Publikationsdatum: 10.05.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Transportation
Print ISSN: 0049-4488
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9435
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10480-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Premium Partner