nach oben

BioControl

Erschienen in:

24.04.2024 | Editorial

A growing number of benefit evaluations and new innovations should foster broader adoption of classical biological control

verfasst von: Mark Schwarzländer, Peter G. Mason

Erschienen in: BioControl | Ausgabe 3/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The contributions in this Special Issue originate from a Symposium “Classical biological control of weeds and arthropods: Evaluation of social, economic and ecological benefits" presented at the 26th International Congress of Entomology, held in Helsinki, Finland in 2022. Following an opening article analyzing agent and target traits associated with greater success odds in weed biological control, a perspective article summarizing how biological control programs are currently assessed and how they may be evaluated going forward frames the articles in the Special Issue. Articles assess different dimensions of success for selected weed and arthropod biocontrol programs either on the individual project level or through summaries of recent projects for geographic regions. Success dimensions include economic, ecological and socio-economic benefits. Included are also several articles that summarize or propose the use of innovative tools to improve biological control as a discipline going forward. Overall, this Special Issue portrays a status quo of biological control characterized by thoughtful analyses of project outcomes and recommendations to improve outcome assessments and increase the odds of success. As such, an optimistic prognosis for biological control is provided.

Nächster Artikel Traits of insect herbivores and target weeds associated with greater biological weed control establishment and impact

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Agboka KM, Tonnang HEZ, Muriithi BW, Niassy S, Ndlela S, Abdel-Rahman EM, Mohamed SA, Ekesi S (2024) Economic impact of a classical biological control program: application to Diachasmimorpha longicaudata against Batrocera dorsalis fruit fly in Kenya. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10217-2CrossRef

Canavan K, Paterson ID, Ivey P, Sutton GF, Hill MP (2021) Prioritisation of targets for weed biological control III: a tool to identify the next targets for biological control in South Africa and set priorities for resource allocation. Biocontrol Sci Technol 31(6):584–601CrossRef

Catton H (2021) Public perceptions of biological control. In: Mason PG (ed) Biological control: Global impacts, challenges and future directions of pest management. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South, pp 262–287

Cock MJW (2019) Unravelling the status of partially identified insect biological control agents introduced to control insects: an analysis of BIOCAT2010. BioControl 64:1–7CrossRef

Collatz J, Hinz HL, Kaser JM, Freimoser FM (2021) Benefits and risks of biological control. In: Mason PG (ed) Biological control: Global impacts, challenges and future directions of pest management. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South, pp 288–311

Colmanarez YC, Vasquez C (2024) Benefits associated with the implementation of biological control programmes in Latin America. BioControl, in press

Culliney TG (2005) Benefits of classical biological control for managing invasive plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:131–150CrossRef

Day MD, Cock MJW, Conant P, Cooke B, Furlong MJ, Paynter Q, Ramandan MM, Wright MG (2021) Biological control successes and failures: Oceania region. In: Mason PG (ed) Biological control: Global impacts, challenges and future directions of pest management. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South, pp 334–367

Dihileepan K, Mcfadyen RC (2012) Parthenium hysterophorus L.—parthenium. In: Julien M, McFadyen R, Cullen J (eds) Biological control of weeds in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 448–462

Dihileepan K, McFadyen R, Strathie L, Khan M (2018) Biological control. In: Adkins S, Shabbir A, Dhileepan K (eds) Parthenium weed: Biology, ecology and management. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 131–156

Downey PO, Paterson ID, Canavan K, Hill MP (2021) Prioritisation of targets for weed biological control I: a review of existing prioritisation schemes and development of a system for South Africa. Biocontrol Sci Technol 31(6):546–565CrossRef

Evans EW (2016) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and classical biological control. Appl Entomol Zool 51:173–184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fung JM, Nepal K, Kafle BD, Eigenbrode SD, Schwarzländer M (2021) Locomotory responses to olfactory cues during host-finding can inform environmental safety assessments of biological weed control agents. Entomol Exp Appl 169(8):758–771CrossRef

Fowler SV, Groenteman R, Paynter Q (2024) The highs and the lows: a cost benefit analysis of classical weed biocontrol in New Zealand. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10225-2

Gaffke AM, Alborn HT, Dudley TL, Bean DW (2021) Using chemical ecology to enhance weed biological control. Insects 12(8):695CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gaskin JF, Bon MC, Cock MJ, Cristofaro M, De Biase A, De Clerck-Floate R, Ellison CA, Hinz HL, Hufbauer RA, Julien MH, Sforza R (2011) Applying molecular-based approaches to classical biological control of weeds. Biol Control 58:1–21CrossRef

Gaskin J (2024) Recent contributions of molecular population genetic and phylogenetic studies to classic biological control of weeds. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10230-5CrossRef

Havens K, Jolls CL, Knight TM, Vitt P (2019) Risks and rewards: assessing the effectiveness and safety of classical invasive plant biocontrol by arthropods. BioScience 69(4):247–258CrossRef

Heimpel GE, Cock MJW (2018) Shifting paradigms in the history of classical biological control. BioControl 63:27–37CrossRef

Hinz HL, Winston RL, Schwarzländer M (2019a) How safe is weed biological control? A global review of direct nontarget attack. Q Rev Biol 94(1):1–27CrossRef

Hinz HL, Bouchier RS, Schaffner U, Schwarzländer M, Weed AS (2019b) Comment on Havens and colleagues (2019). BioScience 69(11):853CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hoddle MS (2024) A new paradigm: proactive biological control of invasive insect pests. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10206-5CrossRef

Khan Z, Midega CAO, Hooper A, Pickett J (2016) Push and Pull: Chemical ecology-based integrated pest management technology. J Chem Ecol 42(7):689–697CrossRefPubMed

Lee K, McDermott S, Fernandez L (2024) Using economics to inform and evaluate biological control programs: opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for future research. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-024-10244-7

Mason PG (2021) Biological control: Global impacts, challenges and future directions of pest management. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton SouthCrossRef

McFadyen R, Dhileepan K, Day M (2018) History and management—Australia and Pacific. In: Adkins S, Shabbir A, Dhileepan K (eds) Parthenium weed: Biology, ecology and management. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 212–230

Midingoyi S-KG, Murithii BW, Aflognon D, AchariaRu MIBP (2021) Economic impact of biological control. In: Mason PG (ed) Biological control: Global impacts, challenges and future directions of pest management. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South, pp 288–311

Naranjo SE, Frisvold GB, Ellsworth PC (2019) Economic value of arthropod biological control. In: Onstad DW, Crain PR (eds) The economics of integrated pest management of insects. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 49–85CrossRef

Neuenschwander P (2001) Biological control of the cassava mealybug in Africa: A review. Biol Control 21:214–229CrossRef

Neuenschwander P (2003) Biological control of cassava and mango mealybugs in Africa. In: Neuenschwander P, Borgemeister C, Langewald J (eds) Biological control in IPM systems in Africa. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 45–59CrossRef

Panta S, Schwarzländer M, Weyl PSR, Hinz HL, Winston RL, Eigenbrode SD, Harmon BL, Bacher S, Paynter Q (2024) Traits of insect herbivores and target weeds associated with greater biological weed control establishment and impact. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-024-10245-6

Park I, Schwarzländer M, Eigenbrode SD, Harmon BL, Hinz HL, Schaffner U (2024) Non-destructive environmental safety assessment of threatened and endangered plants in weed biological control. PeerJ 12:e16813CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Paterson ID, Hill MP, Canavan K, Downey PO (2021) Prioritisation of targets for weed biological control II: the South African Biological Control Target Selection system. Biocontrol Sci Technol 31(6):566–583CrossRef

Paterson ID, Motitsoe SN, Coetzee JA, Hill MP (2024) Recent post-release evaluations of weed biocontrol programmes in South Africa: a summary of what has been achieved and what can be improved. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10215-4CrossRef

Schwarzländer M, Hinz HL, Winston RL, Day MD (2018) Biological control of weeds: an analysis of introductions, rates of establishment and estimates of success, worldwide. BioControl 63(3):319–331CrossRef

Seehausen ML, Afonso C, Jactel H, Kenis M (2021) Classical biological control against insect pests in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East: what influences its success? NeoBiota 65:169–191CrossRef

Sheppard AW, Paynter Q, Mason P, Murphy S, Stoett P, Cowan P, Brodeur J, Warner K, Villegas C, Shaw R, Hinz H, Hill, M and Genovesi P (2019) IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. The application of biological control for the management of established invasive alien species causing environmental impacts.

Smith MC, Julian P, DeAngelis D, Zhang B (2024) Ecological benefits of integrative weed management of Melaleuca quinquenervia in Big Cypress National Preserve. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10229-yCrossRef

Subedi B, Schwarzländer M, Eigenbrode SD, Harmon BL, Weyl P (2024) Studies on the host selection of a weed biological control candidate facilitate prerelease environmental safety assessments. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-024-10255-4CrossRef

Suckling DM, Sforza RFH (2014) What magnitude are observed non-target impacts from weed biocontrol? PLoS ONE 9(1):e84847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

van Driesche RG, Winston RL, Perring TM, Lopez VM (eds) (2022) Contributions of classical biological control to the U.S. food security, forestry, and biodiversity. FHAAST-2019–05. USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA

Winston RL, Schwarzländer M, Hinz HL, Day MD, Cock MJW, Julien MH (2014) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown

Winston RL, Schwarzländer M, Hinz HL, Day MD, Cock MJW, Julien MH (2024a) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. https://www.ibiocontrol.org/catalog/. Accessed 12 Mar 2024

Winston RL, Schwarzländer M, Hinz HL, Pratt PD (2024b) Prioritizing weeds for biological control development in the western USA: adaptation of the biological control target selection system. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-024-10243-8CrossRef

Wyckhuys KAG, Lu Y, Zhou W, Cock MJ, Naranjo SE, Fereti A, Williams FE, Furlong MJ (2020) Ecological pest control fortifies agricultural growth in Asia-Pacific economies. Nat Ecol Evol 4:1522–1530CrossRefPubMed

Titel: A growing number of benefit evaluations and new innovations should foster broader adoption of classical biological control
verfasst von: Mark Schwarzländer
Peter G. Mason
Publikationsdatum: 24.04.2024
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: BioControl / Ausgabe 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1386-6141
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-8248
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-024-10259-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2024

Prioritizing weeds for biological control development in the western USA: adaptation of the Biological Control Target Selection system

Benefits associated with the implementation of biological control programmes in Latin America

Economic impact of a classical biological control program: application to Diachasmimorpha longicaudata against Batrocera dorsalis fruit fly in Kenya

The highs and the lows: a cost benefit analysis of classical weed biocontrol in New Zealand

Using economics to inform and evaluate biological control programs: opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for future research

Traits of insect herbivores and target weeds associated with greater biological weed control establishment and impact