nach oben

Learning Environments Research

08.01.2024 | Original Paper

Adaptation and evaluation of an Estonian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI)

verfasst von: Kristi Palk, Äli Leijen, Aleksandar Baucal, Liina Lepp

Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The main aim of our study was to adapt the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) to an Estonian context. The QTI was translated and evaluated by three educational researchers and validated with a sample of 508 students from grades 6 and 9 in 13 middle schools. When statistical analyses were utilized to investigate reliability and validity of the EstQTI, validity was supported to some degree. However, the underlying circumplex model was not fully confirmed and, therefore, further improvement of the instrument is needed. The factors in the study explained a variance of 68% and the reliability of the eight resulting scales ranged between 0.75 and 0.92. The results are encouraging and indicate that EstQTI has the potential to investigate teacher–student interaction in Estonia.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Admiraal, W., Veldman, I., Mainhard, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2019). A typology of veteran teachers’ job satisfaction: Their relationships with their students and the nature of their work. Social Psychology of Education, 22(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-09477-zCrossRef

Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., & Klusmann, U. (2022). Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher-student interactions and student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09649-yCrossRef

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for Smart teaching. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v14i1.4219CrossRef

Bahoo, R., Nasim, I., Shaheen, R., & Javed, M. L. (2020). A confirmatory factor analysis of Interpersonal Teacher Behaviour Scale: Validation of the Urdu translation of secondary school students’ perspectives. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 6(3), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.47067/reads.v6i3.258CrossRef

den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2006). Multilevel issues in research using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research, 9(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-006-9013-9CrossRef

den Brok, P., Levy, J., Wubbels, T., & Rodriguez, M. (2003). Cultural influences on students’ perceptions of videotaped lessons. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00016-6CrossRef

Donker, M. H., van Vemde, L., Hessen, D. J., van Gog, T., & Mainhard, T. (2021). Observational, student, and teacher perspectives on interpersonal teacher behavior: Shared and unique associations with teacher and student emotions. Learning and Instruction, 73, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101414CrossRef

Dias, P. C., Peixoto, R., & Cadime, I. (2021). Associations between burnout and personal and professional characteristics: A study of Portuguese teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 24(4), 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09640-zCrossRef

Dorman, J. P. (2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 4, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014490922622CrossRef

Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (2005). Research on teacher–student relationships and learning environments: Context, retrospect and prospect. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.001CrossRef

Geng, L., Zheng, Q., Zhong, X., & Li, L. (2020). Longitudinal relations between students’ engagement and their perceived relationships with teachers and peers in a Chinese secondary school. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00463-3CrossRef

Ibrahim, A., & El Zaatari, W. (2020). The teacher–student relationship and adolescents’ sense of school belonging. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1660998CrossRef

Jiang, X., Shi, D., Fang, L., & Ferraz, R. C. (2022). Teacher–student relationships and adolescents’ school satisfaction: Behavioural engagement as a mechanism of change. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12509CrossRef

Ma, L., Liu, J., & Li, B. (2022). The association between teacher-student relationship and academic achievement: The moderating effect of parental involvement. Psychology in the Schools, 59(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22608CrossRef

Mainhard, T. (2015). Liking a tough teacher: Interpersonal characteristics of teaching and students’ achievement goals. School Psychology International, 36(6), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034315608235CrossRef

Misbah, Z., Gulikers, J., Widhiarso, W., & Mulder, M. (2022). Exploring connections between teacher interpersonal behaviour, student motivation and competency level in competence-based learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 25(3), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09395-6CrossRef

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015: Estonian results. Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://www.hm.ee/pisa?view_instance=1&current_page=1#item-2

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018: Estonian results. Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/pisa_2018-19_raportweb.pdf

OECD. (2019b). Talis 2018: Estonian results (volume 1). Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/talis_eesti_raporti_i_osa_0.pdf

Pennings, H. J., van Tartwijk, J., Wubbels, T., Claessens, L. C., van der Want, A. C., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Real-time teacher–student interactions: A dynamic systems approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.016CrossRef

Põhikooli riiklik õppekava [Basic School National Curriculum] (2011). Riigi Teataja I, 14.01.2011, 1. Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114022018008

Scales, P. C., Van Boekel, M., Pekel, K., Syvertsen, A. K., & Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2020). Effects of developmental relationships with teachers on middle-school students’ motivation and performance. Psychology in the Schools, 57(4), 646–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22350CrossRef

Saloviita, T., & Pakarinen, E. (2021). Teacher burnout explained: Teacher-, student-, and organisation-level variables. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103221CrossRef

Sethi, J., & Scales, P. C. (2020). Developmental relationships and school success: How teachers, parents, and friends affect educational outcomes and what actions students say matter most. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101904CrossRef

Sivan, A., & Chan, D. W. (2013). Teacher interpersonal behaviour and secondary students’ cognitive, affective and moral outcomes in Hong Kong. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9123-5CrossRef

Sivan, A., Chan, D. W., & Kwan, Y. W. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the chinese version of the questionnaire on teacher interaction (C—QTI) in Hong Kong. Psychological Reports, 114(3), 823–842.CrossRef

Sun, X., Mainhard, T., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Development and evaluation of a Chinese version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI). Learning Environments Research, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9243-zCrossRef

Tsigilis, N., Karamane, E., & Gregoriadis, A. (2021). Examination of student–teacher interpersonal relationships circumplex model in the Greek educational Context. Psychological Reports, 00332941211061078. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211061078

Van der Lans, R. M., Van de Grift, W. J., & van Veen, K. (2018). Developing an instrument for teacher feedback: Using the Rasch model to explore teachers’ development of effective teaching strategies and behaviors. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1268086CrossRef

Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing revisited: A useful technique, in theory. In Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 23–43). https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654728

Willis, G. B. (2012). Cognitive interviewing training guide. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241686481_Cognitive_Interviewing

Wilson-Fleming, L., & Wilson-Younger, D. (2012). Positive classroom environments= positive academic results. Online submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536465

Wubbels, T., Créton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline problems of beginning teachers: Interactional behaviour mapped out. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Np. Ed. 260040).

Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003CrossRef

Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., & van Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1161–1191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874783CrossRef

Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Levy, J., Mainhard, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2012). Let’s make things better: Developments in research on interpersonal relationships in education. In T. Wubbels, P. den Brok, J. van Tartwijk, & J. Levy (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 225–249). Brill Sense.CrossRef

Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Wijsman, L., Mainhard, T., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2014). Teacher-student relationships and classroom management. In E. Emmer & E. J. Sabornie (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management, 2 (pp. 363–386). Routledge.

Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (1991). A comparison of interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teachers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15(1), 1–18.CrossRef

Titel: Adaptation and evaluation of an Estonian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI)
verfasst von: Kristi Palk
Äli Leijen
Aleksandar Baucal
Liina Lepp
Publikationsdatum: 08.01.2024
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09491-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner