Skip to main content

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. China and the Investment Treaty Regime: Rule Taker or Rule Maker?

verfasst von : Sheng Zhang

Erschienen in: International Investment Law at the Juncture

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The year of 2018 marks the 40th anniversary of China’s opening-up policy, which gives us a great opportunity to review China’s developments and contributions in the area of international investment treaty regime. Since its first bilateral investment treaty (BIT) with Sweden in 1982, China has signed BITs with more than 130 countries. Indeed, China’s practice in international investment law is also a microcosm of China's participation in general international law. When signing BITs, China mainly follows the template or style as set by western countries. Yet with the development of China’s economic growth, China is more willing to establish its own approach toward the investment treaties. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and the BITs negotiations separately with the US and the EU, reveals China’s proactive approach to participate in the global economic governance. The experience in dealing with the cases filed with foreign investors against China also enables China to review its BIT policy. In a time of anti-globalisation, China’s more open and liberal attitude toward foreign investment not only helps to restore foreign investors’ confidence, but also to maintain the stability of the international investment law regime.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Schill (2007). See also Wang (20012002).
 
2
Gallagher and Shan (2009), pp. 7–8.
 
3
Gallagher and Shan (2009), p. 38.
 
4
Shan et al. (2012), pp. 120–144.
 
5
Rongji (2001).
 
6
UNCTAD (2005). It is also observed that the dynamic of BITs between more developed Southern country versus the lesser-developed Southern mirrors that of the BITs between developed countries and developing countries and, therefore the North–South European template is used. Further, such template could avail the Southern countries to negotiate the specialist legal instruments given that they have traditionally had limited capacity and knowledge. See Malik (2010).
 
7
For instance, an observation of the examples of BITs concluded in 2010 and 2011 reveals that several countries continued to adopt such traditional approach. See Schill and Jacob (2013).
 
8
Indeed, behind the high rate of growth, there was a severe environmental degradation. However, among the leadership and the public, development was primarily regarded as economic growth, while damage to the environment or natural resources was perceived as ‘growing pain’ and unavoidable costs for economic development. See Xue (2012), p. 172.
 
9
Berger (2015), pp. 843–868 at 843.
 
10
The 11th Five-Year Plan on the Utilization of Foreign Investments, published by the State Development and Reform Commission (SDRC) on 6 November 2006. English version is available at www.​fdi.​gov.​cn/​pub/​FDI_​EN/​Laws/​GeneralLawsandRe​gulations/​MinisterialRulin​gs/​t20061220_​68109.​jsp. In line with this new FDI policy, China also made steady efforts to reform the domestic laws to eliminate the preferential treatment enjoyed by foreign investment. For details, please see Shan et al. (2012), pp. 129–138.
 
11
Xue (2012), pp. 192–193.
 
12
MOFCOM (2013).
 
13
Shan and Chen (2016), pp. 223–254.
 
14
CPC (2014).
 
16
Such as the Closer Economic Partnership Agreements concluded in 2001 with Hong Kong and Macau and the FTA with Chile in 2005.
 
17
Hepburn et al. (2007).
 
18
Señor Tza Yap Shum v. The Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/6, Decision on Jurisdiction and Competence, 19 June 2009, para. 188. Sanum Investments Limited v. Lao People’s Democratic Republic, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2013–13, Award on Jurisdiction, 13 December 2013, para. 342. Some may also argue that the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) clause in the BITs would be applied to broaden the scope of consent of arbitration, as held by the tribunal of RosInvest v. Russia. By referring to the MFN provision of the UK-Russia BIT and relying on a more extensive dispute settlement provision in the Denmark-UK BIT, the tribunal held that the investors from UK could submit a claim over expropriation to arbitration, while the basic treaty only allowed for arbitration over claims involving the amount of compensation for expropriation. See RosInvestCo UK Ltd. v. The Russian Federation, SCC Case No. V079/2005, Award on Jurisdiction, October 2007, para. 139.
 
19
Tza Yap Shum v. The Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/6, Decision on Jurisdiction and Competence, 19 June 2009, para. 216.
 
20
SVEA Court of Appeal, Judgment, 18 January 2016, available at www.​italaw.​com/​sites/​default/​files/​case-documents/​italaw7714_​8.​pdf.
 
21
For details, please see Gallagher and Shan (2009), pp. 371–376.
 
22
New York Arbitration Convention, Contracting States, www.​newyorkconventio​n.​org/​countries.
 
23
People’s Supreme Court of China, Notice of the Supreme People’s Court on Implementing the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Acceded to by China, No. 5 (1987) of the Supreme People’s Court, 4 October 1987.
 
24
Ku (2013).
 
25
Wang (2011), pp. 204–233 at 228.
 
26
Wang (2011), p. 222.
 
27
Hwang (2005), pp. 410–411.
 
28
Wang (2011), pp. 222–224.
 
29
Ekran Berhad v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/15.
 
30
Qi (2012).
 
31
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25.
 
32
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 56.
 
33
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 76.
 
34
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 85.
 
35
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 114.
 
36
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 110.
 
37
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 115.
 
38
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 122.
 
39
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, paras. 127–8.
 
40
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 138.
 
41
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 139.
 
42
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 142.
 
43
Ansung Housing Co., Ltd. v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/25, Award, 9 March 2017, para. 143.
 
44
Hela Schwarz GmbH v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. No. ARB/17/19.
 
45
Peterson and Williams (2017).
 
46
Moynihan (2017).
 
47
See Kong (1998), pp. 105–136, 110 and Berger (2015), p. 866.
 
48
As pointed out by Professor Kenneth Vandevelde, the US mainly proposed to negotiate the BITs largely based on its model BIT, and it was extremely reluctant from the beginning to compromise on any but a few of the BIT provisions. If such proposal was not accepted, there would be no BIT with that state. See Vandevelde (2009).
 
49
Berger (2015), pp. 865–866.
 
50
Li (2014).
 
51
Chi (2017).
 
52
Shan (2007).
 
53
Indeed, Judge Wang Tieya described China has been ‘a most enthusiastic champion’ for the principle of sovereignty. See Wang (1990).
 
54
Article 6(2) of the 1986 China-Sri Lanka BIT.
 
55
Kong (1998), p. 109.
 
56
Petrovic and Grunberg (2017).
 
57
Shan and Chen (2016), pp. 248–250.
 
58
Li (1988) p. 164.
 
59
Li (1988), p. 167.
 
60
See Annex B of the 2012 US Model BIT.
 
61
Sornarajah (2010), p. 209.
 
62
Guiding Principles and Objectives for negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, available at https://​dfat.​gov.​au/​trade/​agreements/​rcep/​Documents/​guiding-principles-rcep.​pdf.
 
63
China FTA Network, Agreement on Investment of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Co-operation between China and ASEAN, http://​fta.​mofcom.​gov.​cn/​dongmeng_​phase2/​annex/​touzixieyi_​en.​pdf.
 
64
MOFCOM (2016), p. 110.
 
65
Shan and Chen (2016), pp. 249–250.
 
66
Beijing Urban Construction Group Co. Ltd. v. Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/30, Decision on Jurisdiction, 31 May 2017, paras. 40–1.
 
67
Li (2014), p. 173.
 
68
Article 17 of the 2004 Canadian Model BIT, and Article 20 of the 2012 US Model BIT.
 
69
Roberts (2014).
 
70
Fidler (2005).
 
71
United Nations (2016).
 
72
See Dai (2017).
 
73
Shu (2017). As mentioned by the UNCTAD, it is the time to move to a new phase of the reform of international investment agreement by modernizing the existing stock of old-generation treaties. See UNCTAD (2017a).
 
74
Shu (2017), p. 106.
 
75
The People’s Supreme Court of The People’s Republic of China, Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on people’s courts providing judicial services and guarantees for the construction of the Belt and Road Initiative (in Chinese), 7 July 2015, available at, www.​court.​gov.​cn/​zixun-xiangqing-14900.​html.
 
76
The People’s Supreme Court of The People’s Republic of China, Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on people’s courts providing judicial services and guarantees for the construction of the Belt and Road Initiative (in Chinese), 7 July 2015, para.15, available at, www.​court.​gov.​cn/​zixun-xiangqing-14900.​html.
 
77
CIETAC (2017).
 
78
See for instance, Article 44 “Third Party Written Submission” and Article 55 “Publication” of the CIETAC Investment Arbitration Rules.
 
79
Article 27 “Third Party Funding” of the CIETAC Investment Arbitration Rules.
 
80
Article 6 “Good Faith” of the CIETAC Investment Arbitration Rules.
 
81
Article 43 “Combination of Conciliation with Arbitration” of the CIETAC Arbitration Rules.
 
82
UNCTAD (2017b).
 
83
Zhang (2014).
 
84
European Commission, EU-China Investment Agreement: Report of the 13th Round, 15 June 2017, available at http://​trade.​ec.​europa.​eu/​doclib/​docs/​2017/​june/​tradoc_​155625.​pdf.
 
85
According to Michael Froman, US Trade Representative in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations, the US is wary of the investment court system and he said ‘It’s not obvious to me why you would want to give companies a second bite of the apple.’ See Krista Hughes and Philip Blenkinsop, US Wary of EU Proposal for Investment Court in Trade Pact, Reuters, 30 October 2015, available at www.​reuters.​com/​article/​us-trade-ttip/​u-s-wary-of-eu-proposal-for-investment-court-in-trade-pact-idUSKCN0SN2LH201​51029.
 
86
See, for instance, Section 3 of the 2012 China-Canada BIT.
 
87
See, for instance, Article 23, Chapter 9 of the 2015 China-Australia FTA.
 
88
For details, please see UNCITRAL (2017).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Berger A (2015) Hesitant embrace: China’s recent approach to international investment rule-making. J World Invest Trade 16(3) Berger A (2015) Hesitant embrace: China’s recent approach to international investment rule-making. J World Invest Trade 16(3)
Zurück zum Zitat Chi M (2017) From Europeanization toward Americanization: the shift of China’s dichotomic investment treaty-making strategy. Can Foreign Policy J 23(2):158–170, 164 Chi M (2017) From Europeanization toward Americanization: the shift of China’s dichotomic investment treaty-making strategy. Can Foreign Policy J 23(2):158–170, 164
Zurück zum Zitat Fidler DP (2005) The Asian century: implications for international law. Singapore year book of international law, vol 9, pp 19–35 Fidler DP (2005) The Asian century: implications for international law. Singapore year book of international law, vol 9, pp 19–35
Zurück zum Zitat Gallagher N, Shan W (2009) Chinese investment treaties: policies and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford Gallagher N, Shan W (2009) Chinese investment treaties: policies and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Hepburn J et al (2007) Sustainable development in regional trade and investment agreements: policy innovations in Asia? Legal Working Paper, Centre for International Sustainable Development Law, p 40 Hepburn J et al (2007) Sustainable development in regional trade and investment agreements: policy innovations in Asia? Legal Working Paper, Centre for International Sustainable Development Law, p 40
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang M (2005) Why is there still resistance to arbitration in Asia. In: Aksen G, Briner R (eds) Global reflections on international law, commerce and dispute resolution: liber amicorum in honour of Robert Briner, International Chamber of Commerce, pp 410–411 Hwang M (2005) Why is there still resistance to arbitration in Asia. In: Aksen G, Briner R (eds) Global reflections on international law, commerce and dispute resolution: liber amicorum in honour of Robert Briner, International Chamber of Commerce, pp 410–411
Zurück zum Zitat Ku J (2013) The enforcement of ICSID awards in the People’s Republic of China. Contemp Asian Arbitr J 6(1):31–48 Ku J (2013) The enforcement of ICSID awards in the People’s Republic of China. Contemp Asian Arbitr J 6(1):31–48
Zurück zum Zitat Kong Q (1998) Bilateral investment treaties: the Chinese approach and practice. In: Asian Yearbook of international law, vol 8 Kong Q (1998) Bilateral investment treaties: the Chinese approach and practice. In: Asian Yearbook of international law, vol 8
Zurück zum Zitat Li S (1988) Bilateral investment promotion and protection agreements: practice of the People’s Republic of China. In: de Waart PJIM, Peter P, Denters EMG (eds) Int Law Dev Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, London Li S (1988) Bilateral investment promotion and protection agreements: practice of the People’s Republic of China. In: de Waart PJIM, Peter P, Denters EMG (eds) Int Law Dev Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, London
Zurück zum Zitat Li Y (2014) Factors to be considered for China’s future investment treaties. In: Shan W, Su J (eds) China and international investment law: twenty years of ICSID membership. Brill, Leiden Li Y (2014) Factors to be considered for China’s future investment treaties. In: Shan W, Su J (eds) China and international investment law: twenty years of ICSID membership. Brill, Leiden
Zurück zum Zitat MOFCOM (2016) 2015 statistical bulletin of China’s outward foreign direct investment. China Statistics Press, p 110 MOFCOM (2016) 2015 statistical bulletin of China’s outward foreign direct investment. China Statistics Press, p 110
Zurück zum Zitat Moynihan H (2017) China’s evolving approach to international dispute settlement. Chatham House Moynihan H (2017) China’s evolving approach to international dispute settlement. Chatham House
Zurück zum Zitat Petrovic J, Grunberg B (2017) Intersecting trade, politics and human rights: the negotiation phase of the Australia-China free trade agreement. J World Trade 51(1):67–104 Petrovic J, Grunberg B (2017) Intersecting trade, politics and human rights: the negotiation phase of the Australia-China free trade agreement. J World Trade 51(1):67–104
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson LE, Williams Z (2017) Asia round-up: China and Vietnam face new BIT claims-by Hela Schwarz GmbH and Trinh Vinh Binh respectively-as proceedings against Korea and Indonesia move forward. Investment Arbitration Reporter, 22 June 2017 Peterson LE, Williams Z (2017) Asia round-up: China and Vietnam face new BIT claims-by Hela Schwarz GmbH and Trinh Vinh Binh respectively-as proceedings against Korea and Indonesia move forward. Investment Arbitration Reporter, 22 June 2017
Zurück zum Zitat Qi T (2012) How exactly does China consent to investor-state arbitration: on the first ICSID case against China. Contemp Asia Arbitr J 5(2):265–291 Qi T (2012) How exactly does China consent to investor-state arbitration: on the first ICSID case against China. Contemp Asia Arbitr J 5(2):265–291
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts A (2014) State-to-state investment treaty arbitration: a hybrid theory of interdependent rights and shared interpretive authority. Harv Int Law J 55(1):1–70 Roberts A (2014) State-to-state investment treaty arbitration: a hybrid theory of interdependent rights and shared interpretive authority. Harv Int Law J 55(1):1–70
Zurück zum Zitat Schill S (2007) Tearing down the great wall: the new generation investment treaties of the People’s Republic of China. Cardozo J Int Comp Law 15:73 at 82 Schill S (2007) Tearing down the great wall: the new generation investment treaties of the People’s Republic of China. Cardozo J Int Comp Law 15:73 at 82
Zurück zum Zitat Schill S, Jacob M (2013) Trends in international investment agreements, 2011–2012: the increasing complexity of international investment law. In: Sauvant K (ed) Yearbook on international investment law & policy 2011–2012. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 155 Schill S, Jacob M (2013) Trends in international investment agreements, 2011–2012: the increasing complexity of international investment law. In: Sauvant K (ed) Yearbook on international investment law & policy 2011–2012. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 155
Zurück zum Zitat Shan W (2007) From “North-South Divide” to private-public debate: revival of the Calvo doctrine and the changing landscape in international investment law. Northwest J Int Law Bus 27(3):631–664, 664 Shan W (2007) From “North-South Divide” to private-public debate: revival of the Calvo doctrine and the changing landscape in international investment law. Northwest J Int Law Bus 27(3):631–664, 664
Zurück zum Zitat Shan W, Chen H (2016) China-US BIT negotiation and the emerging Chinese BIT 4.0? In: Lim CL (ed) Alternative visions of the international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Shan W, Chen H (2016) China-US BIT negotiation and the emerging Chinese BIT 4.0? In: Lim CL (ed) Alternative visions of the international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Shan W, Gallagher N, Zhang S (2012) National treatment for foreign investment in China: a changing landscape. ICSID Rev 27(1):120–144 at 123 Shan W, Gallagher N, Zhang S (2012) National treatment for foreign investment in China: a changing landscape. ICSID Rev 27(1):120–144 at 123
Zurück zum Zitat Shu Z (2017) China’s approach in drafting the investor-state arbitration clause: a review from the “Belt and Road” Regions’ perspective. Chin J Comp Law 5(1):79–109, 98 Shu Z (2017) China’s approach in drafting the investor-state arbitration clause: a review from the “Belt and Road” Regions’ perspective. Chin J Comp Law 5(1):79–109, 98
Zurück zum Zitat Sornarajah M (2010) The international law on foreign investment, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 209CrossRef Sornarajah M (2010) The international law on foreign investment, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 209CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat UNCTAD (2005) South-South cooperation in international investment arrangements, UNCTAD series on international investment policies and development. United Nations Publications, New York and Geneva, p 31 UNCTAD (2005) South-South cooperation in international investment arrangements, UNCTAD series on international investment policies and development. United Nations Publications, New York and Geneva, p 31
Zurück zum Zitat UNCTAD (2017a) Phase 2 of IIA reform: modernizing the existing stock of old-generation treaties, IIA Issue Note, Issue 2. United Nations Publications, New York and Geneva, p 1 UNCTAD (2017a) Phase 2 of IIA reform: modernizing the existing stock of old-generation treaties, IIA Issue Note, Issue 2. United Nations Publications, New York and Geneva, p 1
Zurück zum Zitat UNCTAD (2017b) World investment report 2017: investment and the digital economy. United Nations Publications, New York and Geneva, pp 118–119 UNCTAD (2017b) World investment report 2017: investment and the digital economy. United Nations Publications, New York and Geneva, pp 118–119
Zurück zum Zitat Vandevelde K (2009) US international investment agreements. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 32CrossRef Vandevelde K (2009) US international investment agreements. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 32CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang T (1990) International law in China: historical and contemporary perspective. Recueil des Cours II (Collected Courses) 221: 203, 252–253 Wang T (1990) International law in China: historical and contemporary perspective. Recueil des Cours II (Collected Courses) 221: 203, 252–253
Zurück zum Zitat Wang G (2011) Chinese mechanisms for resolving investor-state disputes. Jindal J Int Aff 1(1):204–233 at 228 Wang G (2011) Chinese mechanisms for resolving investor-state disputes. Jindal J Int Aff 1(1):204–233 at 228
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J (2001–2002) China and the universal human rights standards. Syracuse J Int Law Commer 29:135–158 at 146 Wang J (2001–2002) China and the universal human rights standards. Syracuse J Int Law Commer 29:135–158 at 146
Zurück zum Zitat Xue H (2012) Chinese contemporary perspectives on international law: history, culture and international law. Hague Academy of International Law. Brill, Leiden Xue H (2012) Chinese contemporary perspectives on international law: history, culture and international law. Hague Academy of International Law. Brill, Leiden
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang S (2014) The China-United States BIT negotiations: a Chinese perspective. Columbia FDI Perspectives, No. 112, 6 January 2014 Zhang S (2014) The China-United States BIT negotiations: a Chinese perspective. Columbia FDI Perspectives, No. 112, 6 January 2014
Metadaten
Titel
China and the Investment Treaty Regime: Rule Taker or Rule Maker?
verfasst von
Sheng Zhang
Copyright-Jahr
2024
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2183-2_9

Premium Partner