Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Digital Twin: What and Why? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Digital Twin and Education in Manufacturing

verfasst von : Giacomo Barbieri, David Sanchez-Londoño, David Andres Gutierrez, Rafael Vigon, Elisa Negri, Luca Fumagalli

Erschienen in: The Digital Twin

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Learning Factories (LFs) enable learning in a factory environment, and – due to the possibility of experiential learning – in manufacturing they are considered the most promising approach to acquire the skills necessary to succeed in the increasingly complex and technologically driven workplace, political, and social arenas of the twenty-first century. Due to the modelling capabilities at the basis of this technology, Digital Twin (DT) can support the implementation of LFs..
In this chapter, the role of DT in manufacturing education is explored through two illustrative examples. Here, the DT technology is utilized to build digital LFs adopted for learning purposes. The first example shows a virtual flow shop that allows students to learn about: (i) Scheduling; (ii) Condition-based Maintenance; (iii) Internet of Things. Whereas in the second example, Virtual Commissioning (VC) is utilized to virtually verify the PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) code before its deployment, allowing students to learn both PLC programming and code verification techniques. The implemented teaching activities were targeted both to students from university and vocational schools. Furthermore, they dealt with different phases of the lifecycle of manufacturing processes. Throughout this chapter, it will be demonstrated that the application of the DT technology to LFs enables the building of a flexible teaching environment that can be customized based on the type of students and the competences that must be taught.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Digital Twin and Cultural Heritage – The Future of Society Built on History and Art
Nächstes Kapitel Future Evolution of Digital Twins
Fußnoten
2
Sanchez-Londono, D., Barbieri, G., & Garces, K. (2022). XWare: a Middleware for Smart Retrofitting in Maintenance. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(19), 109–114.
 
Literatur
1.
Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E., & Fogli, D. (2019). A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE Access, 7, 167653–167671.
2.
Liu, M., Shuiliang, F., Huiyue, D., & Cunzhi, X. (2021). Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58, 346–361.
3.
Lu, Y., Chao, L., Kai Wang, I. K., Huiyue, H., & Xun, X. (2020). Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 61, 101837.
4.
Liljaniemi, A., & Paavilainen, H. (2020). Using digital twin technology in engineering education – Course concept to explore benefits and barriers. Open Engineering, 10(1), 377–385.
5.
Nikolaev, S., Gusev, M., Padalitsa, D., Mozhenkov, E., Mishin, S., & Uzhinsky, I. (2018). Implementation of “digital twin” concept for modern project-based engineering education. In IFIP international conference on product lifecycle management.
6.
Rassudov, L., & Korunets, A. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic challenges for engineering education. In XI international conference on electrical power drive systems (ICEPDS).
7.
Sepasgozar, S. M. (2020). Digital twin and web-based virtual gaming technologies for online education: A case of construction management and engineering. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4678.
8.
Hamid, M. H. M. I., Masrom, M., & Salim, K. R. (2014). Review of learning models for production based education training in technical education. In International conference on teaching and learning in computing and engineering.
9.
Hempen, S., Wischniewski, S., Maschek, T., & Deuse, J. (2010). Experiential learning in academic education: A teaching concept for efficient work system design. In 4th workshop of the special interest group on experimental interactive learning in industrial management.
10.
Plorin, D., & Müller, E. (2013). Developing an ambient assisted living environment applying the advanced learning factory. In International simulation and gaming association conference.
11.
Barbieri, G., Garces, K., Abolghasem, S., Martinez, S., Pinto, M. F., Andrade, G., Castro, F., & Jimenez, F. (2021). An engineering multidisciplinary undergraduate specialty with emphasis in society 5.0. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(3), 744–760.
12.
Lamancusa, J. S., Zayas, J. L., Soyster, A. L., Morell, L., & Jorgensen, J. (2008). 2006 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture*: The learning factory: Industry‐partnered active learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 5–11.
13.
R. S. (1988). Außerbetriebliche CIM-Schulung in der Lernfabrik. In Produktionsforum’88 (pp. 581–601).
14.
Alptekin, S., Pouraghabagher, R., McQuaid, P., & Waldorf, D. (2001). Teaching factory. In Annual conference.
15.
Wagner, U., AlGeddawy, T., ElMaraghy, H., & Mÿller, E. (2012). The state-of-the-art and prospects of learning factories. Procedia CiRP, 3, 109–114.
16.
Sudhoff, M., Prinz, C., & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2020). A systematic analysis of learning factories in Germany-concepts, production processes, didactics. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 114–120.
17.
Wienbruch, T., Leineweber, S., Kreimeier, D., & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2018). Evolution of SMEs towards Industrie 4.0 through a scenario based learning factory training. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 141–146.
18.
Abele, E., Metternich, J., Tisch, M., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., ElMaraghy, H., Hummel, V., & Ranz, F. (2015). Learning factories for research, education, and training. Procedia CiRp, 32, 1–6.
19.
Abele, E. (2016). Learning factory. CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering.
20.
Abele, E., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., Metternich, J., ElMaraghy, H., Seliger, G., Sivard, G., ElMaraghy, W., Hummel, V., Tisch, M., & Seifermann, S. (2017). Learning factories for future oriented research and education in manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 66(2), 803–826.
21.
Andrés, M., Álvaro, G., & Julián, M. (2019). Advantages of learning factories for production planning based on shop floor simulation: A step towards smart factories in Industry 4.0. In World conference on engineering education (EDUNINE).
22.
Haghighi, A., Shariatzadeh, N., Sivard, G., Lundholm, T., & Eriksson, Y. (2014). Digital learning factories: Conceptualization, review and discussion. In 6th Swedish production symposium.
23.
Al-Geddawy, T. (2020). A digital twin creation method for an opensource low-cost changeable learning factory. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1799–1805.
24.
Protic, A., Jin, Z., Marian, R., Abd, K., Campbell, D., & Chahl, J. (2020). Implementation of a bi-directional digital twin for Industry 4 labs in academia: A solution based on OPC UA. In IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM).
25.
Brenner, B., & Hummel, V. (2017). Digital twin as enabler for an innovative digital shopfloor management system in the ESB Logistics Learning Factory at Reutlingen-University. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 198–205.
26.
Ralph, B. J., Schwarz, A., & Stockinger, M. (2020). An implementation approach for an academic learning factory for the metal forming industry with special focus on digital twins and finite element analysis. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 253–258.
27.
Hänggi, R., Nyffenegger, F., Ehrig, F., Jaeschke, P., & Bernhardsgrütter, R. (2020). Smart learning factory–network approach for learning and transfer in a digital & physical set up. In IFIP international conference on product lifecycle management.
28.
Uhlemann, T. H. J., Schock, C., Lehmann, C., Freiberger, S., & Steinhilper, R. (2017). The digital twin: Demonstrating the potential of real time data acquisition in production systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 113–120.
29.
Grube, D., Malik, A. A., & Bilberg, A. (2019). SMEs can touch Industry 4.0 in the smart learning factory. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 219–224.
30.
Martinez, S., Mariño, A., Sanchez, S., Montes, A. M., Triana, J. M., Barbieri, G., Abolghasem, S., Vera, J., & Guevara, M. (2021). A digital twin demonstrator to enable flexible manufacturing with robotics: A process supervision case study. Production & Manufacturing Research.
31.
Umeda, Y., Ota, J., Shirafuji, S., Kojima, F., Saito, M., Matsuzawa, H., & Sukekawa, T. (2020). Exercise of digital kaizen activities based on ‘digital triplet’ concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 325–330.
32.
Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., & Macchi, M. (2017). A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 939–948.
33.
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018). Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-Papers Online, 51, 1016–1022.
34.
Biesinger, F., & Weyrich, M. (2019). The facets of digital twins in production and the automotive industry. In 23rd international conference on mechatronics technology (ICMT).
35.
Post, F. H., & Van Walsum, T. (1993). Fluid flow visualization. In Focus on scientific visualization (pp. 1–40). Springer.
36.
Bei, Y., & Fregly, B. J. (2004). Multibody dynamic simulation of knee contact mechanics. Medical Engineering & Physics, 26, 777–789.
37.
Pandolfi, A., & Ortiz, M. (2002). An efficient adaptive procedure for three-dimensional fragmentation simulations. Engineering with Computers, 18, 148–159.
38.
Schiehlen, W. (1997). Multibody system dynamics: Roots and perspectives. Multibody System Dynamics, 1, 149–188.MathSciNetMATH
39.
Hübner, B., Walhorn, E., & Dinkler, D. (2004). A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction using space–time finite elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 193, 2087–2104.MATH
40.
O’Brien, J. S., Julien, P. Y., & Fullerton, W. T. (1993). Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119, 244–261.
41.
Sherman, W. (2003). Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design. Morgan Kaufmann.
42.
Soete, N., Claeys, A., Hoedt, S., Mahy, B., & Cottyn, J. (2015). Towards mixed reality in SCADA applications. IFAC-Papers Online, 48, 2417–2422.
43.
Havard, V., Jeanne, B., Lacomblez, M., & Baudry, D. (2019). Digital twin and virtual reality: A co-simulation environment for design and assessment of industrial workstations. Production & Manufacturing Research, 7, 472–489.
44.
Wursthorn, S., Coelho, A. H., & Staub, G. (2004). Applications for mixed reality. In XXth ISPRS congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
45.
Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I. A. C., Raya, M. A., & Riva, G. (2018). The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: A network and cluster analysis of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2086.
46.
Matuszka, T., Gombos, G., & Kiss, A. (2013). A new approach for indoor navigation using semantic webtechnologies and augmented reality. In International conference on virtual, augmented and mixed reality.
47.
Barbieri, G., Bertuzzi, A., Capriotti, A., Ragazzini, L., Gutierrez, D., Negri, E., & Fumagalli, L. (2021). A virtual commissioning based methodology to integrate digital twins into manufacturing systems. Production Engineering, 15, 397–412.
48.
Pinedo, M. (2016). Scheduling: Theory, algorithms, and systems. Springer.MATH
49.
Mitchell, M. (1998). An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press.MATH
50.
Li, R., Verhagen, W. J., & Curran, R. (2020). A systematic methodology for prognostic and health management system architecture definition. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 193, 106598.
51.
Barbieri, G., Sanchez-Londoño, D., Cattaneo, L., Fumagalli, L., & Romero, D. (2020). A case study for problem-based learning education in fault diagnosis assessment. IFAC-Papers Online, 53, 107–112.
52.
Borgia, E. (2014). The internet of things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Computer Communications, 54, 1–31.
53.
Romero, N., Medrano, R., Garces, K., Sanchez-Londono, D., & Barbieri, G. (2021). XRepo 2.0: A big data information system for education in prognostics and health management. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 12.
54.
Ardila, A., Martinez, F., Garces, K., Barbieri, G., Sanchez-Londono, D., Caielli, A., Cattaneo, L., & Fumagalli, L. (2020). XRepo-towards an information system for prognostics and health management analysis. Procedia Manufacturing, 42, 146–153.
55.
Lee, C. G., & Park, S. C. (2014). Survey on the virtual commissioning of manufacturing systems. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 1(3), 213–222.
56.
Hofmann, W., Langer, S., Lang, S., & Reggelin, T. (2017). Integrating virtual commissioning based on high level emulation into logistics education. Procedia Engineering, 178, 24–32.
57.
Mortensen, S. T., & Madsen, O. (2018). A virtual commissioning learning platform. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 93–98.
Metadaten
Titel
Digital Twin and Education in Manufacturing
verfasst von
Giacomo Barbieri
David Sanchez-Londoño
David Andres Gutierrez
Rafael Vigon
Elisa Negri
Luca Fumagalli
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Buch
The Digital Twin

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21342-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-21343-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21343-4_35

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise