nach oben

Landscape and Ecological Engineering

Erschienen in:

27.02.2023 | Special Feature: Review

Dominant barriers and the solutions to the social application of environmental DNA

verfasst von: Hideyuki Doi, Keigo Nakamura

Erschienen in: Landscape and Ecological Engineering | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The environmental DNA (eDNA) method for biological monitoring has become increasingly popular in the last decade. Thus far, eDNA detection and quantification have been used for various taxa in various ecosystems. The eDNA method can survey the community with less cost and habitat disturbance with a broad spatial scale. The road map for halting the trend of nature's decline and becoming “nature positive” by 2030 is yet to be clarified. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop indicators to assist in understanding the impacts of commercial activities and public development on the environment, and eDNA from broad community surveys can significantly contribute to the development of these indicators. For eDNA survey applications, numerous considerations have been considered regarding potential limitations to these social applications. Here, we summarize the dominant barriers to the social application of eDNA surveys. In particular, we discuss four dominant barriers: (1) technical problems of practice, (2) cost and budget for eDNA survey, (3) human resources, and (4) social acceptance and reasoning toward implementing a “nature positive” society. To address these barriers, we have provided potential solutions from various perspectives, including technical and social aspects.

Vorheriger Artikel Responsive evaluation of college students-in-residence rural community competition

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Berry O, Jarman S, Bissett A, Hope M, Paeper C, Bessey C, Schwartz MK, Hale J, Bunce M (2021) Making environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity records globally accessible. Environ DNA 3:699–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.173CrossRef

Bista I, Carvalho GR, Walsh K, Seymour M, Hajibabaei M, Lallias D, Christmas M, Creer S (2017) Annual time-series analysis of aqueous environmental DNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity. Nat Commun 8:14087. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14087CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bruce K, Blackman RC, Bourlat SJ, Hellström M, Bakker J, Bista I, Bohmann K, Bouchez A, Brys R, Clark K, Elbrecht V (2021) A practical guide to DNA-based methods for biodiversity assessment. Pensoft Advanced BooksCrossRef

Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148CrossRefPubMed

Cordier T, Forster D, Dufresne Y, Martins CIM, Stoeck T, Pawlowski J (2018) Supervised machine learning outperforms taxonomy-based environmental DNA metabarcoding applied to biomonitoring. Mol Ecol Resour 18:1381–1391. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12926CrossRefPubMed

Davy CM, Kidd AG, Wilson CC (2015) Development and validation of environmental DNA (eDNA) markers for detection of freshwater turtles. PLoS ONE 10:e0130965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130965CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Deiner K, Altermatt F (2014) Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLoS ONE 9:e88786. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Deiner K, Bik HM, Mächler E, Seymour M, Lacoursière-Roussel A, Altermatt F, Creer S, Bista I, Lodge DM, de Vere N, Pfrender ME, Bernatchez L, Bista I, Lodge DM, de Vere N, Pfrender ME, Bernatchez L (2017) Environmental DNA metabarcoding: transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol Ecol 26:5872–5895. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14350CrossRefPubMed

Doi H, Takahara HT, Minamoto T, Matsuhashi S, Uchii K, Yamanaka H (2015a) Droplet digital PCR outperforms real-time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species. Environ Sci Technol 49:5601–5608. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00253CrossRefPubMed

Doi H, Inui HR, Akamatsu Y, Kanno K, Yamanaka H, Takahara T, Minamoto T (2017a) Environmental DNA analysis for estimating the abundance and biomass of stream fish. Freshw Biol 62:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12846CrossRef

Doi H, Katano HI, Sakata Y, Souma R, Kosuge T, Nagano M, Ikeda K, Yano K, Tojo K (2017b) Detection of an endangered aquatic heteropteran using environmental DNA in a wetland ecosystem. R Soc Open Sci 4:170568. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Doi H, Uchii HK, Matsuhashi S, Takahara T, Yamanaka H, Minamoto T (2017c) Isopropanol precipitation method for collecting fish environmental DNA. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 15:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10161CrossRef

Doi H, Inui R, Matsuoka S, Akamatsu Y, Goto M, Kono T (2021a) Estimation of biodiversity metrics by environmental DNA metabarcoding compared with visual and capture surveys of river fish communities. Freshw Biol 66:1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13714

Doi H, Watanabe T, Nishizawa N, Saito T, Nagata H, Kameda Y, Maki N, Ikeda K, Fukuzawa T (2021) On-site environmental DNA detection of species using ultrarapid mobile PCR. Mol Ecol Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13448CrossRef

Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2008) Species detection using eDNA from water samples. Biol Lett 4:423–425. https://doi.org/10.1098/Rsbl.2008.0118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fujiwara A, Matsuhashi S, Doi H, Yamamoto S, Minamoto T (2016) Use of environmental DNA to survey the distribution of an invasive submerged plant in ponds. Freshw Sci 35:748–754. https://doi.org/10.1086/685882CrossRef

Fukaya K, Kondo NI, Matsuzaki SS, Kadoya T (2022) Multispecies site occupancy modeling and study design for spatially replicated environmental DNA metabarcoding. Methods Ecol Evol 13:183–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13732CrossRef

Fukumoto S, Ushimaru A, Minamoto T (2015) A basin-scale application of environmental DNA assessment for rare endemic species and closely related exotic species in rivers: a case study of giant salamanders in Japan. J Appl Ecol 52:358–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12392CrossRef

Ge Y, Wang DZ, Chiu JF, Cristobal S, Sheehan D, Silvestre F, Peng X, Li H, Gong Z, Lam SH, Wentao H (2013) Environmental OMICS: current status and future directions. J Integr OMIC 3:75–87. https://doi.org/10.5584/jiomics.v3i2.141

Goldberg CS, Strickler KM, Pilliod DS (2015) Moving eDNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms. Biol Conserv 183:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.040CrossRef

Goldberg CS, Turner CR, Deiner K, Klymus KE, Thomsen PF, Murphy MA, Spear SF, McKee A, Oyler-McCance SJ, Cornman RS, Laramie MB, Mahon AR, Lance RF, Pilliod DS, Strickler KM, Waits LP, Fremier AK, Takahara T, Herder JE, Taberlet P (2016) Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1299–1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12595CrossRef

Ikeda K, Doi H, Tanaka K, Kawai T, Negishi JN (2016) Using environmental DNA to detect an endangered crayfish Cambaroides japonicus in streams. Conserv Genet Resour 8:231–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-016-0541-zCrossRef

Ishige T, Miya M, Ushio M, Sado T, Ushioda M, Maebashi K, Yonechi R, Lagan P, Matsubayashi H (2017) Tropical-forest mammals as detected by environmental DNA at natural saltlicks in Borneo. Biol Conserv 210:281–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.023CrossRef

Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2011) ‘Sight unseen’ detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conserv Lett 4:150–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.xCrossRef

King AC, Krieg R, Weston A, Zenker AK (2022) Using eDNA to simultaneously detect the distribution of native and invasive crayfish within an entire country. J Env Manag 302:113929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113929

Klymus KE, Merkes CM, Allison MJ, Goldberg CS, Helbing CC, Hunter ME, Jackson CA, Lance RF, Mangan AM, Monroe EM, Piaggio AJ, Stokdyk JP, Wilson CC, Richter CA, Lance RF, Mangan AM, Monroe EM, Piaggio AJ, Stokdyk JP, Wilson CC, Richter CA (2020) Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays. Environ DNA 2:271–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.29CrossRef

Langlois VS, Allison MJ, Bergman LC, To TA, Helbing CC (2021) The need for robust qPCR-based eDNA detection assays in environmental monitoring and species inventories. Environ DNA 3:519–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.164CrossRef

Locke H, Rockström J, Bakker P, Bapna M, Gough M, Hilty J, Lambertini M, Morris J, Polman P, Rodriguez CM, Samper C (2021) A nature-positive world: the global goal for nature. https://www.wbcsd.org/download/file/11960

Mahon AR, Barnes MA, Li F, Egan SP, Tanner CE, Ruggiero ST, Feder JL, Lodge DM (2013) DNA-based species detection capabilities using laser transmission spectroscopy. J R Soc Interface 10:20120637. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0637CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Takahara T, Honjo MN, Kawabata Z (2012) Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology 13:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-011-0362-4CrossRef

Minamoto T, Miya M, Sado T, Seino S, Doi H, Kondoh M, Nakamura K, Takahara T, Yamamoto S, Yamanaka H, Araki H (2021) An illustrated manual for environmental DNA research: water sampling guidelines and experimental protocols. Environmental DNA 3:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.121CrossRef

Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Poulsen JY, Sato K, Minamoto T, Yamamoto S, Yamanaka H, Araki H, Kondoh M (2015) MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. Royal Soc Open Sci 2:150088. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150088

Miya M, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Oka SI, Sato K, Yamamoto S, Sado T, Doi H (2016) Use of a filter cartridge for filtration of water samples and extraction of eDNA. J vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/54741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nakagawa H, Yamamoto S, Sato Y, Sado T, Minamoto T, Miya M (2018) Comparing local-and regional-scale estimations of the diversity of stream fish using eDNA metabarcoding and conventional observation methods. Freshw Biol 63:569–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13094CrossRef

Nakamura K (2022) Nature-based solutions for river restoration in Japan. In: Ishiwatari M, Sasaki D (eds) Financing investment in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation disaster risk reduction. Springer, Singapore

Oka SI, Doi H, Miyamoto K, Hanahara N, Sado T, Miya M (2020) Environmental DNA metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring of a highly diverse tropical fish community in a coral reef lagoon: estimation of species richness and detection of habitat segregation. Environ DNA 3:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.132CrossRef

Ogata S, Doi H, Igawa T, Komaki S, Takahara T (2022) Environmental DNA methods for detecting two invasive alien species (American bullfrog and red swamp crayfish) in Japanese ponds. Ecol Res 37:701–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12341

Pawlowski J, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Altermatt F (2020) Environmental DNA: what’s behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring. Mol Ecol 29:4258–4264. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15643CrossRefPubMed

Piaggio AJ, Engeman RM, Hopken MW, Humphrey JS, Keacher KL, Bruce WE, Avery ML (2014) Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of eDNA. Mol Ecol Res 14:374–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12180CrossRef

Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2013) Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 70:1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0047CrossRef

Rabosky DL, Chang J, Title PO, Cowman PF, Sallan L, Friedman M, Kaschner K, Garilao C, Near TJ, Coll M, Alfaro ME (2018) An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes. Nature 559:392–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0273-1

Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Morissette O, Bean CW, Manu S, Banerjee P, Lacoursière-Roussel A et al (2021) Trade-offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: comment on “environmental DNA: what’s behind the term?” by Pawlowski et al. (2020). Mol Ecol 30:4601–4605. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15942CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schneider J, Valentini A, Dejean T, Montarsi F, Taberlet P, Glaizot O, Fumagalli L (2016) Detection of invasive mosquito vectors using environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples. PLoS ONE 11:e0162493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162493CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Scriver M, Marinich A, Wilson C, Freeland J (2015) Development of species-specific environmental DNA (eDNA) markers for invasive aquatic plants. Aquat Bot 122:2741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2015.01.003CrossRef

Sepulveda AJ, Hutchins PR, Jackson C, Ostberg C, Laramie MB, Amberg J, Counihan T, Hoegh A, Pilliod DS (2020) A round‐robin evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of environmental DNA assays for dreissenid mussels. Environmental DNA 2:446–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.68

Smart AS, Weeks AR, van Rooyen AR, Moore A, McCarthy MA, Tingley R (2016) Assessing the cost-efficiency of environmental DNA sampling. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12598CrossRef

Smith JR, Letten AD, Ke PJ, Anderson CB, Hendershot JN, Dhami MK, Dlott GA, Grainger TN, Howard ME, Morrison BM, Routh D. (2018) A global test of ecoregions. Nat Ecol Evol 2:1889–1896. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0709-x

Sundberg P, Obst M, Dahlgren T, Panova M, Axberg A (2020) Swedish eDNA. Gotherburg. University of Gotherburg, Sweden. https://www.gu.se/en/research/swedna-swedish-edna-lab

Takahara T, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Doi H, Kawabata ZI (2012) Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLoS ONE 7:e35868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035868CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H (2013) Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds. PLoS ONE 8:e56584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Thomsen PF, Willerslev E (2015) Environmental DNA – an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol Conserv 183:4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019CrossRef

Toyama T, Onikura N, Mitsumasu S, Saito Y (2019) Construction of fish species distribution models for class A rivers and development of the system for supporting nature-oriented river work. Adv River Eng 25:363–368. https://doi.org/10.11532/river.25.0_363. (in Japanese)CrossRef

Tréguier A, Paillisson J-M, Dejean T, Valentini A, Schlaepfer MA, Roussel J-M (2014) Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. J Appl Ecol 51:871–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12262CrossRef

Tsuji S, Takahara T, Doi H, Shibata N, Yamanaka H (2019) The detection of aquatic macroorganisms using environmental DNA analysis—a review of methods for collection, extraction, and detection. Environ DNA 1:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.21CrossRef

Uchii K, Doi H, Minamoto T (2016) A novel environmental DNA approach to quantify the cryptic invasion of non-native genotypes. Mol Ecol Res 16:415–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12460CrossRef

Ushio M, Fukuda H, Inoue T, Makoto K, Kishida O, Sato K, Murata K, Nikaido M, Sado T, Sato Y, Takeshita M, Iwasaki W, Yamanaka H, Kondoh M, Miya M (2017) Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water. Mol Ecol Res 17:e63–e75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12690CrossRef

Ushio M, Murata K, Sado T, Nishiumi I, Takeshita M, Iwasaki W, Miya M (2018) Demonstration of the potential of environmental DNA as a tool for the detection of avian species. Sci Rep 8:4493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22817-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wang H, Zhou Y, Xu X, Li H, Sun H (2020) Metalloproteomics in conjunction with other omics for uncovering the mechanism of action of metallodrugs: mechanism-driven new therapy development. Cur Opin Chem Biol 55:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.02.006

Wilcox TM, McKelvey KS, Young MK, Sepulveda AJ, Shepard BB, Jane SF, Whiteley AR, Lowe WH, Schwartz MK (2016) Understanding environmental DNA detection probabilities: a case study using a stream-dwelling char Salvelinus fontinalis. Biol Conserv 194:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.023CrossRef

World Economic Forum (2020) The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland

Yamanaka H, Minamoto T (2016) The use of environmental DNA of fishes as an efficient method of determining habitat connectivity. Ecol Indic 62:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.022CrossRef

Titel: Dominant barriers and the solutions to the social application of environmental DNA
verfasst von: Hideyuki Doi
Keigo Nakamura
Publikationsdatum: 27.02.2023
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Landscape and Ecological Engineering / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1860-1871
Elektronische ISSN: 1860-188X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-023-00549-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Forest road use by mammals revealed by camera traps: a case study in northeastern Japan

Investigation of hydrodynamics along an embankment generated by a nearby riparian vegetation patch

Mapping local knowledge through spatial text mining

The 30-year impact of post-windthrow management on the forest regeneration process in northern Japan

Predicting habitat suitability of Litsea glutinosa: a declining tree species, under the current and future climate change scenarios in India

Evaluation of pre- and post-fire flood risk by analytical hierarchy process method: a case study for the 2021 wildfires in Bodrum, Turkey