nach oben

09.02.2024 | Original Article

Influence of avoided biomass decay on a life cycle assessment of oil palm residues-based ethanol

verfasst von: Arief Ameir Rahman Setiawan, Teuku Beuna Bardant, Muryanto Muryanto, Eka Triwahyuni, Riaru Ishizaki, Deliana Dahnum, Ary Mauliva Hada Putri, Yan Irawan, Roni Maryana, Yanni Sudiyani, Anny Sulaswatty, Edi Iswanto Wiloso, Tofael Ahamed, Cécile Chéron-Bessou, Ryozo Noguchi

Erschienen in: Energy, Ecology and Environment

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Lignocellulosic (bio)ethanol from oil palm agricultural residue was investigated regarding feedstock availability and environmental impacts while accounting for avoided biomass decay. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out at both pilot- and large-scale plants, from oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) collection until ethanol production and use. The primary data were gathered from a pilot plant at Research Center for Chemistry BRIN, Indonesia. Producing bioethanol at a large scale required 59.8% of available feedstock within a 200 km radius, with the need for chemical fertilizer to substitute EFB-based fertilizer to replenish soil nutrients. Global warming potential impacts, evaluated using CML IA Baseline 2016, indicating 8.06 and − 0.14 kg CO₂eq/kg would be generated at pilot- and large-scale plants, respectively. Considering the use of ethanol from large scale plant by car, the GWP impact for bioethanol, gasoline, and E5 (blending of 5% ethanol and 95% gasoline) is − 3.07, 84.07 and 81.23 g CO₂eq/MJ, respectively. The negative value of such an impact at the large scale indicated that bioethanol would lead to 1.42% and 3.38% reduction of GWP at production phase and E5 use phase, respectively. Some options were investigated to improve the GWP impact and energy profit ratio at the plant level, covering main impact contributors such as energy sources, enzymes, and chemical materials. The consideration of avoided decay may lead to further potential implication for E5 policy, which can contribute to achieving 7.46% of the national GHGs reduction target in the transportation sector. Further research would be recommended, at larger scales, to identify various biomass decay emission profiles as well as spatialized biomass availability while ensuring to maintain soil quality.

Graphical abstract

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Alamsyah Z, Napitupulu D, Hamid E, Yanita M, Fauzia G (2021) Factors affecting the FFB price of independent smallholder oil palm farmers in Jambi Province. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/782/3/032060CrossRef

Ani FN (2015) Utilization of bioresources as fuels and energy generation. Electr Renew Energy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804448-3.00008-6CrossRef

APROBI (2023) Pemerintah Keluarkan Aturan Standar BBM Nabati. https://www.aprobi.or.id/pemerintah-keluarkan-aturan-standar-bbm-nabati/. Accessed 16 Aug 2023

Argon Laboratory (2021) Polyethylene glycol dataset in GREET v1.3.0.13991

Balan V (2014) Current challenges in commercially producing biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass. ISRN Biotechnol 2014

Bird N, Cherubini F, Jungmeier G (2013) Using a life cycle assessment approach to estimate the net greenhouse gas emissions of bioenergy

Boschma S, Kwant IKW (2013) Valorization of palm oil ( mill ) residues. Identifying and solving the challenges. NL Agency 38

BP (2022) Statistical review of world energy. 2022. Available at:

Buchspies B, Kaltschmitt M, Junginger M (2020) Straw utilization for biofuel production: a consequential assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from bioethanol and biomethane provision with a focus on the time dependency of emissions. GCB Bioenergy 12:789–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12734CrossRef

Caldeira-Pires A, Benoist A, da Luz SM, Silverio VC, Silveira CM, Machado FS (2018) Implications of removing straw from soil for bioenergy: an LCA of ethanol production using total sugarcane biomass. J Clean Prod 181:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.119CrossRef

Cannella D, Jørgensen H (2014) Do new cellulolytic enzyme preparations affect the industrial strategies for high solids lignocellulosic ethanol production? Biotechnol Bioeng 111:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25098CrossRefPubMed

Carriquiry MA, Du X, Timilsina GR (2011) Second generation biofuels: economics and policies. Energy Policy 39:4222–4234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.036CrossRef

Carusedjp (2021) If you buy a Canter (canter truck), what is the best mileage?

Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:434–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013CrossRef

Chiew YL, Shimada S (2013) Current state and environmental impact assessment for utilizing oil palm empty fruit bunches for fuel, fiber and fertilizer—a case study of Malaysia. Biomass Bioenerg 51:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.012CrossRef

Contadini JF (2002) Life cycle assessment of fuel cell vehicles—dealing with uncertainties. University of California

de Azevedo A, Fornasier F, da Silva Szarblewski M, de Souza Schneider RDC, Hoeltz M, de Souza D (2017) Life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from cattle manure. J Clean Prod 162:1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.141CrossRef

Delikonstantis E, Igos E, Augustinus M, Benetto E, Stefanidis GD (2020) Life cycle assessment of plasma-assisted ethylene production from rich-in-methane gas streams. Sustain Energy Fuels 4:1351–1362. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9se00736aCrossRef

Demirbaş A, Demirbaş AH (2004) Estimating the calorific values of lignocellulosic fuels. Energy Explor Exploit 22:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1260/0144598041475198CrossRef

Devi A, Singh A, Bajar S, Pant D, Din ZU (2021) Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: an in-depth analysis of pre-treatment methods, fermentation approaches and detoxification processes. J Environ Chem Eng 9:105798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105798CrossRef

Do TX, Lim YI, Jang S, Chung HJ (2015) Hierarchical economic potential approach for techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from palm empty fruit bunches. Bioresour Technol 189:224–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.020CrossRefPubMed

Dumfort S, Kirchmair C, Floerl K, Larch C, Rupprich M (2018) Storage as the weak link of the biomass supply chain. In: Africa-EU renewable energy research and innovation symposium. pp 117–125

Ecochain (2023) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)—How is it different from LCA? https://ecochain.com/blog/environmental-impact-assessment-eia-how-is-it-different-from-lca/

Ecoinvent Database version 8.3.0 , Sodium Hydroxide in 50% solution state, market, global, and Potassium Hydroxide, market, global,

Ecoinvent (2016) Petrol, Low Sulfur, RoW—Datasets in SimaPro Faculty

Erivianto D, Dani A, Gunawan H (2022) Pengolahan Biomassa Tandan Kosong Kelapa Sawit Sebagai Bahan Bakar Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Uap. J Indones Sos Teknol 3:162–171. https://doi.org/10.36418/jist.v3i1.337CrossRef

European Parliament, Council of the European Union (2009) DIRECTIVE 2009/30/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 98/70/EC as regards the specification of petrol, diesel and gas-oil and introducing a mechanism to monitor and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and amend. Off J Eur Union 88:88–113

Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, And MS, Dorland R Van (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Fujita H, Nakano K, Chaisomphob T, Hambali E (2019) Greenhouse gas emission of electricity generation and field abandonment scenarios using empty fruit bunches at a palm oil Mill, Surat Thani Province, Thailand. J Jpn Inst Energy 98:119–123. https://doi.org/10.3775/jie.98.119CrossRef

Gandam PK, Chinta ML, Pabbathi NPP, Baadhe RR, Sharma M, Thakur VK, Sharma GD, Ranjitha J, Gupta VK (2022) Second-generation bioethanol production from corncob—a comprehensive review on pretreatment and bioconversion strategies, including techno-economic and lifecycle perspective. Ind Crops Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115245CrossRef

Giuntoli J, Agostini A, Caserini S, Lugato E, Baxter D, Marelli L (2016) Climate change impacts of power generation from residual biomass. Biomass Bioenerg 89:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.02.024CrossRef

IPCC (2006) Chapter 2: Stationary Combustion in 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

González-García S, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, Murphy RJ (2012) Comparative life cycle assessment of ethanol production from fast-growing wood crops (black locust, eucalyptus and poplar). Biomass Bioenerg 39:378–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.028CrossRef

Hergoualc’h K, Akiyama H, Bernoux M, Chirinda N, del Prado A, Kasimir Å, MacDonald JD, Ogle SM, Regina K, Weerden TJ van der, Liang C, Noble A (2019) Chapter 11: N₂O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. In: 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC

Hidayati S, Zuidar AS, Satyajaya W, Murhadi M, Retnowati D (2018) Isolation and characterization of formacell Lignins from oil empty fruits bunches. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/344/1/012006CrossRef

Hidayati S, Satyajaya W, Fudholi A (2020) Lignin isolation from black liquor from oil palm empty fruit bunch using acid. J Mater Res Technol 9:11382–11391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.08.023CrossRef

Hindustan Times (2021) The importance of the PM’s ethanol push

IEA (2020) Sustainable Recovery: Fuels

Indian Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (2022) India has achieved the target of 10 percent ethanol blending, 5 months ahead of schedule

Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture (2022) Statistical of National Leading Estate Crops Commodity 2021–2023

Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (2022) Konsumsi Pertalite Capai 23 Juta KL, Paling Banyak Digunakan Masyarakat

Indonesian Ministry of Environment (2018) Kontribusi Penurunan Emisi GRK Nasional, Menuju NDC 2030

International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework

IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, p 151

Gómez DR, Watterson JD, Americanohia BB, Ha C, Marland G, Matsika E, Namayanga LN, Osman-Elasha B, Saka JK, Treanton K (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Chapter 2 Stationary Combustion. IPCC, IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland

Jeon H, Kang KE, Jeong JS, Gong G, Choi JW, Abimanyu H, Ahn BS, Suh DJ, Choi GW (2014) Production of anhydrous ethanol using oil palm empty fruit bunch in a pilot plant. Biomass Bioenerg 67:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.022CrossRef

Jeswani HK, Chilvers A, Azapagic A (2020) Environmental sustainability of biofuels: a review: Environmental sustainability of biofuels. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0351CrossRef

Kiuchi T, Yoshida M, Kato Y (2015) Energy saving bioethanol distillation process with self-heat recuperation technology. J Jpn Pet Inst 58:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1627/jpi.58.135CrossRef

Kosugi A, Yamashita M (2022) Rebuilding Malaysia’s Palm Oil Industry Sustainable with “Innovative Biomass”

Kouisni L, Holt-Hindle P, Maki K, Paleologou M (2012) The lignoforce system: a new process for the production of high-quality lignin from black liquor. J. Sci. Technol. for. Prod. Process 2:6–10

Lee ZY, Liew PY, Woon KS, Tan LS, Tamunaidu P, Klemeš JJ (2021) Life-cycle environmental and cost analysis of palm biomass-based bio-ethanol production in Malaysia. Chem Eng Trans 89:85–90. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2189015CrossRef

Lineback N, Dellinger T, Shienvold LF, Witcher B, Reynolds A, Brown LE (1999) Industrial greenhouse gas emissions: Does CO₂ from combustion of biomass residue for energy really matter? Clim Res 13:221–229. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr013221CrossRef

Liu G, Bao J (2017) Evaluation of electricity generation from lignin residue and biogas in cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 243:1232–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.022CrossRefPubMed

Lubis MAR, Dewi AR, Risanto L, Zaini LH, Hermiati E (2014) Isolation and characterization of lignin from alkaline pretreatment black liquor of oil palm empty fruit bunch and sugarcane bagasse. Proc Asean Cosat 2014:483–491

Lya A, Udiantoro AH (2016) Karakteristik serat tandan kosong kelapa sawit (tkks) dengan perlakuan perebusan dan pengukusan. Ziraa’ah 41:97–102

Mann M, Spath P (2001) A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant. Clean Prod Process 3:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100980100109CrossRef

Matemilola S, Salami HA (2021) Environmental assessment. In: Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer, pp 1–4

Matsushima J (1996) Why is the energy balance ratio view important?—Reexamination of the definition and significance of EPR. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 3:42–47

Ministry of Transportation (2023) Penurunan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca (GRK) pada Transportasi Perkotaan melalui Upaya Penyeimbangan Karbon

Muryanto TE, Hendarsyah H, Abimanyu H (2015) Reuse black liquor of alkali pretreatment in bioethanol production. Energy Procedia 68:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.252CrossRef

Nogueira GP, Capaz RS, Franco TT, Dias MOS, Cavaliero CKN (2022) Enzymes as an environmental bottleneck in cellulosic ethanol production: Does on-site production solve it? J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133314CrossRef

Nugroho R, Hanafi J, Shobatake K, Chun YY, Tahara K, Purwanto WW (2022) Life cycle inventories and life cycle assessment for an electricity grid network: case study of the Jamali grid, Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 27:1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02082-5CrossRef

Olisa YP, Island W, State B, Kotingo KW, Island W, State B (2014) Utilization of palm empty fruit bunch (pefb) as solid fuel for steam boiler. Eur J Eng Technol 2:1–7

Pacheco R, Silva C (2019) Global warming potential of biomass-to-ethanol: review and sensitivity analysis through a case study. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132535CrossRef

Pehme S, Veromann E, Hamelin L (2017) Environmental performance of manure co-digestion with natural and cultivated grass—a consequential life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 162:1135–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.067CrossRef

Prudhomme R, O’Donoghue C, Ryan M, Styles D (2021) Defining national biogenic methane targets: Implications for national food production & climate neutrality objectives. J Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113058CrossRef

Raham D (2004) Study of mineral nutrient losses from oil palm empty fruit bunches during temporary storage. J Oil Palm Res 16:11–21

Raj T, Chandrasekhar K, Naresh Kumar A, Rajesh Banu J, Yoon JJ, Kant Bhatia S, Yang YH, Varjani S, Kim SH (2022) Recent advances in commercial biorefineries for lignocellulosic ethanol production: current status, challenges and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126292CrossRefPubMed

Rentizelas AA (2016) Biomass storage. Biomass Supply Chain Bioenergy Biorefining. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-366-9.00006-XCrossRef

Reuters (2023) Indonesia’s Pertamina launches sales of gasoline with 5% ethanol mix

Ro JW, Zhang Y, Kendall A (2023) Developing guidelines for waste designation of biofuel feedstocks in carbon footprints and life cycle assessment. Sustain Prod Consum 37:320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.009CrossRef

Setiawan VN (2022) Bioetanol Bisa Jadi Bahan Bakar, Kapan RI Mau Ngembangin?

Sharma B, Larroche C, Dussap CG (2020) Comprehensive assessment of 2G bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123630CrossRefPubMed

Shukla PR, Skea J, Slade R, Fradera R, Pathak M, Khourdajie A Al, Belkacemi M, Diemen R van, Hasija A, Lisboa G, Luz S, Malley J, McCollum D, Some S, Vyas P (2022) Mitigation of Climate Change—Climate Change 2022

Singh A, Pant D, Korres NE, Nizami AS, Prasad S, Murphy JD (2010) Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 101:5003–5012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.062CrossRefPubMed

Soleymani Angili T, Grzesik K, Rödl A, Kaltschmitt M (2021) Life cycle assessment of bioethanol production: a review of feedstock, technology and methodology. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102939CrossRef

Soni SK, Batra N, Bansal N, Soni R (2010) Bioconversion of sugarcane bagasse into second generation bioethanol after enzymatic hydrolysis with in-house produced cellulases from Aspergillus sp. S4B2F. BioResources 5:741–757CrossRef

Sonnichsen N (2022) Global biodiesel production 2021 by country. In: Stat. 2022

Sreekumar A, Shastri Y, Wadekar P, Patil M, Lali A (2020) Life cycle assessment of ethanol production in a rice-straw-based biorefinery in India. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01791-0CrossRef

Sudiyani Y, Styarini D, Triwahyuni E, Sudiyarmanto SKC, Aristiawan Y, Abimanyu H, Han MH (2013) Utilization of biomass waste empty fruit bunch fiber of palm oil for bioethanol production using pilot—scale unit. Energy Procedia 32:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.005CrossRef

Sulaiman F, Abdullah N, Aliasak Z (2013) Solar drying system for drying empty fruit bunches. J Phys Sci 24:75–93

Sung CTB (2016) Availability, use, and removal of oil palm biomass in Indonesia

Tellnes LGF, Ganne-Chedeville C, Dias A, Dolezal F, Hill C, Escamilla EZ (2017) Comparative assessment for biogenic carbon accounting methods in carbon footprint of products: a review study for construction materials based on forest products. Iforest 10:815–823. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2386-010CrossRef

The Engineering Toolbox (2003) Fuels—higher and lower calorific values

Triwahyuni E, Suaidah S, Sugiwati S, Muryanto M, Abimanyu H (2023) Lactic acid production from oil palm empty fruit bunch using lactobacillus delbrueckii. AIP Conf Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118356CrossRef

UNFCC (2022) Enhanced nationally determined contribution: Republic of Indonesia

UNFCCC/CCNUCC (2014) III. E Avoidance of methane production from biomass decay through controlled combustion

US Department of Agriculture (2022) Biofuels Annual Report: Indonesia

USLCI (2013) Novozyme Cellulase Dataset in SimaPro Faculty

Usman F (2019) Ethanol Dilemma. In: Pertamina. https://www.pertamina.com/id/news-room/market-insight/ethanol-dilemma. Accessed 3 Apr 2022

Vaskan P, Pachón ER, Gnansounou E (2018) Techno-economic and life-cycle assessments of biorefineries based on palm empty fruit bunches in Brazil. J Clean Prod 172:3655–3668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.218CrossRef

Villegas JM, Avila H (2014) Quick-scan estimating model of higher heating value of oil palm empty fruit bunches based on ash from proximate analysis data. Ing e Investig 34:33–38. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v34n2.40504CrossRef

Wibawa DS, Nasution MA, Noguchi R, Ahamed T, Demura M, Watanabe MM (2018) Microalgae oil production: a downstream approach to energy requirements for the minamisoma pilot plant. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030521CrossRef

Wihersaari M (2005) Evaluation of greenhouse gas emission risks from storage of wood residue. Biomass Bioenerg 28:444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.011CrossRef

Wiloso EI, Heijungs R, De Snoo GR (2012) LCA of second generation bioethanol: a review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:5295–5308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.035CrossRef

Wiloso EI, Bessou C, Heijungs R (2015) Methodological issues in comparative life cycle assessment: treatment options for empty fruit bunches in a palm oil system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:204–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0815-1CrossRef

Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change: supplementary information. Nat Commun 1:56ADSCrossRefPubMed

Zhou Y, Searle S, Anup S (2021) Techno-economic analysis of cellulosic ethanol in India using agricultural residues. ICCT-White Pap 1–18

Titel: Influence of avoided biomass decay on a life cycle assessment of oil palm residues-based ethanol
verfasst von: Arief Ameir Rahman Setiawan
Teuku Beuna Bardant
Muryanto Muryanto
Eka Triwahyuni
Riaru Ishizaki
Deliana Dahnum
Ary Mauliva Hada Putri
Yan Irawan
Roni Maryana
Yanni Sudiyani
Anny Sulaswatty
Edi Iswanto Wiloso
Tofael Ahamed
Cécile Chéron-Bessou
Ryozo Noguchi
Publikationsdatum: 09.02.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Energy, Ecology and Environment
Print ISSN: 2363-7692
Elektronische ISSN: 2363-8338
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-024-00317-9