Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 3-4/2023

07.03.2023 | Critical Review

Integrating the digital twin concept into the evaluation of reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS): literature review and research trend

verfasst von: Jesus Kombaya Touckia

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 3-4/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the rapid advent of new information technologies (Big Data analytics, cyber-physical systems, such as IoT, cloud computing and artificial intelligence), digital twins are being used more and more in smart manufacturing. Despite the fact that their use in industry has attracted the attention of many practitioners and researchers, there is still a need for an integrated and comprehensive digital twin framework for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. To close this research gap, we present evidence from a systematic literature review, including 76 papers from high-quality journals. This paper presents the current research trends on evaluation and the digital twin in reconfigurable manufacturing systems, highlighting application areas and key methodologies and tools. The originality of this paper lies in its proposal of interesting avenues for future research on the integration of the digital twin in the evaluation of RMS. The benefits of digital twins are multiple such as evaluation of current and future capabilities of an RMS during its life cycle, early discovery of system performance deficiencies and production optimization. The idea is to implement a digital twin that links the virtual and physical environments. Finally, important issues and emerging trends in the literature are highlighted to encourage researchers and practitioners to develop studies in this area that are strongly related to the Industry 4.0 environment.
Nächster Artikel Challenges and recent progress on the application of rapid sand casting for part production: a review

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Aheleroff S, Xu X, Zhong RY, Lu Y (2021) Digital twin as a service (dtaas) in industry 4.0: an architecture reference model. Adv Eng Inf 47:101–225CrossRef
2.
Andersen AL, Brunoe TD, Nielsen K, Rösiö C (2017) Towards a generic design method for reconfigurable manufacturing systems: analysis and synthesis of current design methods and evaluation of supportive tools. J Manuf Syst 42:179–195CrossRef
3.
Belhadi A, Kamble S, Jabbour CJC, Gunasekaran A, Ndubisi NO, Venkatesh M (2021) Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the covid-19 outbreak: lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries. Technol Forecast Social Change 163:120–447CrossRef
4.
Benderbal HH, Yelles-Chaouche AR, Dolgui A (2020) A digital twin modular framework for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. In: IFIP international conference on advances in production management systems. Springer, pp 493–500
5.
Burgos D, Ivanov D (2021) Food retail supply chain resilience and the covid-19 pandemic: a digital twin-based impact analysis and improvement directions. Transport Res Part E Logistics Transport Rev 152:102–412CrossRef
6.
Chamola V, Hassija V, Gupta V, Guizani M (2020) A comprehensive review of the covid-19 pandemic and the role of iot, drones, ai, blockchain, and 5g in managing its impact. Ieee Access 8:90,225–90,265CrossRef
7.
Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2016) An adapted nsga-ii algorithm for a reconfigurable manufacturing system (rms) design under machines reliability constraints. In: Metaheuristics for production systems. Springer, pp 109–130
8.
Delorme X, Malyutin S, Dolgui A (2016) A multi-objective approach for design of reconfigurable transfer lines. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12):509–514CrossRef
9.
Durach CF, Kembro J, Wieland A (2017) A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manag 53(4):67–85CrossRef
10.
Beauville dit Eynaud A, Klement N, Roucoules L, Gibaru O, Durville L (2022) Framework for the design and evaluation of a reconfigurable production system based on movable robot integration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118(7):2373–2389CrossRef
11.
Farid AM (2014) An axiomatic design of a multi-agent reconfigurable manufacturing system architecture. In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on axiomatic design, p 155
12.
Fragapane G, Ivanov D, Peron M, Sgarbossa F, Strandhagen JO (2020) Increasing flexibility and productivity in industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics. Annals Oper Res:1–19
13.
Golgeci I, Yildiz HE, Andersson UR (2020) The rising tensions between efficiency and resilience in global value chains in the post-covid-19 world. Trans Corporations J, 27, 2
14.
Govindan K, Mina H, Alavi B (2020) A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: a case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19). Transport Res Part E Logistics Transport Rev 138:101–967CrossRef
15.
Goyal KK, Jain PK (2016) Design of reconfigurable flow lines using mopso and maximum deviation theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(5-8):1587–1600
16.
Goyal KK, Jain P, Jain M (2012) Optimal configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing system using nsga ii and topsis. Int J Prod Res 50(15):4175–4191CrossRef
17.
Goyal S (2012) Connections. Princeton University Press
18.
Grieves M (2014) Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White Paper 1:1–7
19.
Gumasta K, Kumar Gupta S, Benyoucef L, Tiwari M (2011) Developing a reconfigurability index using multi-attribute utility theory. Int J Prod Res 49(6):1669–1683CrossRef
20.
Guo D, Bao J, Shi G, Zhang Q, Sun X, Weng H (2018) Modeling of aerospace structural parts manufacturing workshop based on digital twinning [j]. J Donghua Univ (Natural Sci Edn) 44 (04):578–585
21.
Gupta A, Jain PK, Kumar D (2015) Configuration selection of reconfigurable manufacturing system based on performance. Int J Ind Syst Eng 20(2):209–230
22.
Haddou-Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2016) Hybrid heuristic to minimize machine’s unavailability impact on reconfigurable manufacturing system using reconfigurable process plan. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12):1626–1631CrossRef
23.
Hashemi-Petroodi SE, Dolgui A, Kovalev S, Kovalyov MY, Thevenin S (2020) Workforce reconfiguration strategies in manufacturing systems: a state of the art. Int J Prod Res:1–24
24.
Huettemann G, Gaffry C, Schmitt RH (2016) Adaptation of reconfigurable manufacturing systems for industrial assembly–review of flexibility paradigms, concepts, and outlook. Procedia CIRP 52:112–117CrossRef
25.
Ivanov D (2020) Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: a simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (covid-19/sars-cov-2) case. Transport Res Part E Logistics Transport Rev 136:101–922CrossRef
26.
Ivanov D, Dolgui A (2021) A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of industry 4.0. Prod Plan Control 32(9):775–788CrossRef
27.
Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Sokolov B (2022) Cloud supply chain: integrating industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the supply chain-as-a-service. Transport Res Part E Logistics Transport Rev 160:102–676CrossRef
28.
Kaivo-oja J, Kuusi O, Knudsen MS, Lauraéus T (2020) Digital twin: current shifts and their future implications in the conditions of technological disruption. Int J Web Eng Technol 15(2):170–188CrossRef
29.
Kapitanov A, Mitrofanov V, Egorov S (2018) A study of reconfigurable production system performance. In: MATEC Web of conferences, EDP sciences, vol 224, p 02063
30.
Kombaya Touckia J, Hamani N, Kermad L (2022) Digital twin framework for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (rmss): design and simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–20
31.
Koren Y, Shpitalni M (2010) Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 29(4):130–141CrossRef
32.
Koren Y, Heisel U, Jovane F, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Annals 48(2):527–540CrossRef
33.
Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Frontiers Mech Eng 13(2):121–136CrossRef
34.
Leng J, Liu Q, Ye S, Jing J, Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang D, Chen X (2020) Digital twin-driven rapid reconfiguration of the automated manufacturing system via an open architecture model. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 63:101–895CrossRef
35.
Li X, Wang L, Zhu C, Liu Z (2021) Framework for manufacturing-tasks semantic modelling and manufacturing-resource recommendation for digital twin shop-floor. J Manuf Syst 58:281–292CrossRef
36.
Liu S, Lu S, Li J, Sun X, Lu Y, Bao J (2021a) Machining process-oriented monitoring method based on digital twin via augmented reality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113(11):3491–3508CrossRef
37.
Liu W, Shanthikumar JG, Lee PTW, Li X, Zhou L (2021b) Special issue editorial: smart supply chains and intelligent logistics services. Transport Res Part E Logistics Transport Rev 147:102–256CrossRef
38.
Lu Y, Liu C, Kevin I, Wang K, Huang H, Xu X (2020) Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 61:101–837CrossRef
39.
Maganha I, Silva C, Ferreira LMD (2018) Understanding reconfigurability of manufacturing systems: an empirical analysis. J Manuf Syst 48:120–130CrossRef
40.
Maganha I, Silva C, Ferreira LMD (2019) The impact of reconfigurability on the operational performance of manufacturing systems. J Manuf Technol Manag
41.
Manuj I, Mentzer JT (2008) Global supply chain risk management. J Business Logistics 29 (1):133–155CrossRef
42.
Mehrabi MG, Ulsoy AG, Koren Y (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: key to future manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 11(4):403–419CrossRef
43.
Miao T, Zhang X, Xiong H, Zhuang C, Zhao H, Lv Z, Liu J (2019) Applications and expectation of digital twin in product lifecycle. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 25(6):1546–1558
44.
Mittal P, Jain A, Goswami G, Singh R, Vatsa M (2014) Recognizing composite sketches with digital face images via ssd dictionary. IEEE Int Joint Conf Biometrics, IEEE, pp 1–6
45.
Napoleone A, Pozzetti A, Macchi M (2018) Core characteristics of reconfigurability and their influencing elements. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11):116–121CrossRef
46.
Pournader M, Kach A, Talluri S (2020) A review of the existing and emerging topics in the supply chain risk management literature. Decis Sci 51(4):867–919CrossRef
47.
Prasad D, Jayswal S (2019) Assessment of a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Benchmarking: an international journal
48.
Qi Q, Tao F, Hu T, Anwer N, Liu A, Wei Y, Wang L, Nee A (2019) Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J Manuf Syst
49.
Qi Q, Tao F, Hu T, Anwer N, Liu A, Wei Y, Wang L, Nee A (2021) Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J Manuf Syst 58:3–21CrossRef
50.
Queiroz MM, Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Fosso Wamba S (2020) Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: mapping a research agenda amid the covid-19 pandemic through a structured literature review. Annals Oper Res:1–38
51.
Rodič B (2017) Industry 4.0 and the new simulation modelling paradigm. Organizacija, vol 50(3)
52.
Rösiö C (2012) Supporting the Design of Reconfigurable Production Systems. Mälardalen University, PhD Thesis
53.
Rösiö C, Aslam T, Srikanth KB, Shetty S (2019) Towards an assessment criterion of reconfigurable manufacturing systems within the automotive industry. Proced Manuf 28:76–82
54.
Shao G et al (2021) Use case scenarios for digital twin implementation based on iso 23247. National institute of standards: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
55.
Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, Nee AY (2018) Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 15(4):2405–2415CrossRef
56.
Tao F, Sui F, Liu A, Qi Q, Zhang M, Song B, Guo Z, Lu SCY, Nee AY (2019) Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int J Prod Res 57(12):3935–3953CrossRef
57.
Van Der Hoek W, Backer JA, Bodewes R, Friesema I, Meijer A, Pijnacker R, Reukers DF, Reusken C, Roof I, Rotors N et al (2020) De rol van kinderen in de transmissie van sars-cov-2. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 164(25):D5140
58.
Wang GX, Huang SH, Yan Y, Du JJ (2017) Reconfiguration schemes evaluation based on preference ranking of key characteristics of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89 (5):2231–2249CrossRef
59.
Wang X, Wang Y, Tao F, Liu A (2021) New paradigm of data-driven smart customisation through digital twin. J Manuf Syst 58:270–280CrossRef
60.
Wei Y, Hu T, Zhou T, Ye Y, Luo W (2021) Consistency retention method for cnc machine tool digital twin model. J Manuf Syst 58:313–322CrossRef
61.
Xu X, Wang L, Fratini L, Ragai I, Nee AYC (2021) Smart and resilient manufacturing in the wake of covid-19. J Manuf Syst 60:707CrossRef
62.
Xu Z, Elomri A, Kerbache L, El Omri A (2020) Impacts of covid-19 on global supply chains: facts and perspectives. IEEE Eng Manag Rev 48(3):153–166CrossRef
63.
Yang S, Li T (2002) Agility evaluation of mass customization product manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 129(1-3):640–644CrossRef
64.
Yi Y, Yan Y, Liu X, Ni Z, Feng J, Liu J (2021) Digital twin-based smart assembly process design and application framework for complex products and its case study. J Manuf Syst 58:94–107CrossRef
65.
Zhang C, Xu W, Liu J, Liu Z, Zhou Z, Pham D T (2019a) A reconfigurable modeling approach for digital twin-based manufacturing system. Procedia Cirp 83:118–125CrossRef
66.
Zhang C, Zhou G, He J, Li Z, Cheng W (2019b) A data-and knowledge-driven framework for digital twin manufacturing cell. Procedia CIRP 83:345–350CrossRef
67.
Zhang D, Xie M, Yan H, Liu Q (2021) Resilience dynamics modeling and control for a reconfigurable electronic assembly line under spatio-temporal disruptions. J Manuf Syst 60:852–863CrossRef
68.
Zhang H, Ma L, Sun J, Lin H, Thürer M (2019c) Digital twin in services and industrial product service systems:: review and analysis. Procedia CIRP 83:57–60CrossRef
69.
Zheng P, Wang H, Sang Z, Zhong RY, Liu Y, Liu C, Mubarok K, Yu S, Xu X (2018) Smart manufacturing systems for industry 4.0: conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives. Frontiers Mech Eng 13(2):137–150CrossRef
70.
Zheng Y, Yang S, Cheng H (2019) An application framework of digital twin and its case study. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput 10(3):1141–1153CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Integrating the digital twin concept into the evaluation of reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS): literature review and research trend
verfasst von
Jesus Kombaya Touckia
Publikationsdatum
07.03.2023
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 3-4/2023
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10902-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2023

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 3-4/2023 Zur Ausgabe

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Design of a novel 2D ultrasonic transducer for 2D high-frequency vibration–assisted micro-machining

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A machine learning method for cutting parameter selection in rotary ultrasonic-assisted end grinding

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Ladle pouring process parameter and quality estimation using Mask R-CNN and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalisation

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Predictive model of surface roughness in milling of 7075Al based on chatter stability analysis and back propagation neural network

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Compressive response versus power consumption of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene in material extrusion additive manufacturing: the impact of seven critical control parameters

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A geometric error measurement method for five-axis ultra-precision machine tools

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise