Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Management International Review

02.05.2024 | Research Article

MNCs’ Social Innovation in Emerging Markets: A Stakeholder Perspective

verfasst von: Shufeng Xiao, Taewoo Roh, Pervez N. Ghauri, Moon Hwan Cho, Byung Il Park

Erschienen in: Management International Review

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the effects of primary and secondary stakeholders on social innovation practices in local markets by subsidiaries of multinational corporations (MNCs) and to confirm the link between social innovation and the subsidiaries’ capacity to adapt to the local market. By adopting a stakeholder perspective as an overarching theoretical lens and collecting data from China—the world’s largest emerging market—this study reveals the crucial catalytic role that most primary and secondary stakeholders play in enhancing social innovation by MNC subsidiaries in host countries. In addition, we provide strong evidence of a causal relationship between social innovation and adaptive capability in host economies. Our results contribute to current scholarship by identifying theoretical cornerstones and practical managerial implications of social innovation in emerging markets.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Management International Review

MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW is a double-blind refereed journal that aims at the advancement and dissemination of research in the fields of International Management.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
According to GlobalEDGE (2023), developed markets are generally mature and have high gross domestic product, gross national product, and per capita incomes. Mature markets are characterized by industrialization, are stable, and have lower risk than emerging and frontier markets.
 
2
The World Health Organization first reported the COVID-19 outbreak on January 30, 2020, and declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020. https://​www.​who.​int/​emergencies/​diseases/​novel-coronavirus-2019.
 
3
They are the Academy of Management Review, California Management Review, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Harvard Business Review, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Business Strategy, Journal of Management Studies, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Long Range Planning, Management Decision, Social Responsibility Journal, Strategic Management Journal, and Strategy & Leadership.
 
4
We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer who recommended Lange & Pfarrer (2017), which is helpful for us in strengthening the structure and logic of our Introduction.
 
5
“Local community” refers to a group of local residents who closely interact, pursue common regional values, and have communal social bonds based on a certain regional area, as a sub-unit of a country (Conable 2015). The local community shares common elements, such as regionality operating within a close geographic space, active social interactions between people, a common sense of belonging, and a social identity.
 
6
We thank an anonymous reviewer for offering this insight.
 
Literatur
Adomako, S., & Tran, M. D. (2022). Local embeddedness, and corporate social performance: The mediating role of social innovation orientation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 329–338.CrossRef
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2012). Antecedents and contingent effects of organizational adaptive capability on firm product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), 171–189.CrossRef
Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391–407.CrossRef
Algarni, M. A., Ali, M., Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Latan, H., Ali, I., & Ullah, S. (2022). Make green, live clean! linking adaptive capability and environmental behavior with financial performance through corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 131156.CrossRef
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRef
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.CrossRef
Asante Boadi, E., He, Z., Bosompem, J., Opata, C. N., & Boadi, E. K. (2020). Employees’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its effects on internal outcomes. Service Industries Journal, 40(9–10), 611–632.CrossRef
Ashta, A., Assadi, D., & Marakkath, N. (2015). The strategic challenges of a social innovation: The case of Rang De in crowdfunding. Strategic Change, 24(1), 1–14.CrossRef
Babu, M. M., Dey, B. L., Rahman, M., Roy, S. K., Syed Alwi, S. F., & Kamal, M. M. (2020). Value co-creation through social innovation: A study of sustainable strategic alliance in telecommunication and financial services sectors in Bangladesh. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 13–27.CrossRef
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.CrossRef
Bhatt, P., Ahmad, A. J., & Roomi, M. A. (2016). Social innovation with open source software: User engagement and development challenges in India. Technovation, 52, 28–39.CrossRef
Browning, C. R., & Cagney, K. A. (2003). Moving beyond poverty: Neighborhood structure, social processes, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(4), 552–571.CrossRef
Bruton, G. D., Dess, G. G., & Janney, J. J. (2007). Knowledge management in technology-focused firms in emerging economies: Caveats on capabilities, networks, and real options. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24, 115–130.CrossRef
Chang, S.-J., Van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 178–184.CrossRef
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Piccolo, R. (2021). Enterprise social network for knowledge sharing in MNCs: Examining the role of knowledge contributors and knowledge seekers for cross-country collaboration. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100827.CrossRef
Chi, W., & Chen, Y. (2021). Employee satisfaction and the cost of corporate borrowing. Finance Research Letters, 40, 101666.CrossRef
Child, J., & Tse, D. K. (2001). China’s transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 5–21.CrossRef
Crank, J. P., Giacomazzi, A., & Heck, C. (2003). Fear of crime in a nonurban setting. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(3), 249–263.CrossRef
Crilly, D., Schneider, S. C., & Zollo, M. (2008). Psychological antecedents to socially responsible behavior. European Management Review, 5(3), 175–190.CrossRef
Cull, R., Xu, L. C., Yang, X., Zhou, L.-A., & Zhu, T. (2017). Market facilitation by local government and firm efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 460–480.CrossRef
De Silva, M., Khan, Z., Vorley, T., & Zeng, J. (2020). Transcending the pyramid: Opportunity co-creation for social innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 471–486.CrossRef
Delios, A., Perchthold, G., & Capri, A. (2021). Cohesion, COVID-19 and contemporary challenges to globalization. Journal of World Business, 56(3), 101197.CrossRef
Deng, P. (2012). Accelerated internationalization by MNCs from emerging economies. Organizational Dynamics, 41(4), 318–326.CrossRef
Descubes, I., Timsit, J. P., & Truong, Y. (2013). Social innovation in emerging economies: A resource-based view perspective. Strategic Change, 22(7–8), 503–510.CrossRef
Dionisio, M., & de Vargas, E. R. (2020). Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review. International Business Review, 29(2), 101641.CrossRef
Dionisio, M., & de Vargas, E. R. (2022). Integrating corporate social innovations and cross-collaboration: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 139, 794–803.CrossRef
Dorado, S., Antadze, N., Purdy, J., & Branzei, O. (2022). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Leveraging management research on grand challenges. Business & Society, 61(5), 1242–1281.CrossRef
Ethiraj, S. K., Kale, P., Krishnan, M. S., & Singh, J. V. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 25–45.CrossRef
Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 97–106). Prentice Hall.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRef
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Gereffi, G., Pananond, P., & Pedersen, T. (2022). Resilience decoded: The role of firms, global value chains, and the state in COVID-19 medical supplies. California Management Review, 64(2), 46–70.CrossRef
Gutiérrez, R., Márquez, P., & Reficco, E. (2016). Configuration and development of alliance portfolios: A comparison of same-sector and cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 55–69.CrossRef
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publication.CrossRef
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
Han, C. M., Kim, K. A., & Nam, H. (2020). Can corporate philanthropy change consumers’ perceptions of Japanese multinationals and reduce animosity toward them? Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(1), 65–85.CrossRef
Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33–48.CrossRef
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97–124.CrossRef
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.CrossRef
Hillebrand, B., Driessen, P. H., & Koll, O. (2015). Stakeholder marketing: Theoretical foundations and required capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 411–428.CrossRef
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.CrossRef
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 838–849.CrossRef
Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Djurdjevic, E. (2011). Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 744.CrossRef
Kim, N., Sun, J., Yin, H., & Moon, J. J. (2022). Do foreign firms help make local firms greener? Evidence of environmental spillovers in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(7), 1370–1393.CrossRef
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.CrossRef
Kull, A. J., Mena, J. A., & Korschun, D. (2016). A resource-based view of stakeholder marketing. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5553–5560.CrossRef
Kusi, S. Y., Gabrielsson, P., & Baumgarth, C. (2022). How classical and entrepreneurial brand management increases the performance of internationalising SMEs? Journal of World Business, 57(5), 101311.CrossRef
Lange, D., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2017). Editors’ comments: Sense and structure—The core building blocks of an AMR article. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 407–416.CrossRef
Lee, M., & Jay, J. (2015). Strategic responses to hybrid social ventures. California Management Review, 57(3), 126–147.CrossRef
Lee, M.-J., & Roh, T. (2023). Unpacking the sustainable performance in the business ecosystem: Coopetition strategy, open innovation, and digitalization capability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137433.CrossRef
Lin, T. C. (2018). Incorporating social activism. Boston University Law Review, 98, 1535.
Lind, C. H., Kang, O., Ljung, A., & Rosenbaum, P. (2022). Involvement of multinational corporations in social innovation: Exploring an emerging phenomenon. Journal of Business Research, 151, 207–221.CrossRef
Lindström, M., Merlo, J., & Östergren, P.-O. (2003). Social capital and sense of insecurity in the neighbourhood: A population-based multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden. Social Science & Medicine, 56(5), 1111–1120.CrossRef
Lu, Y., Zhou, L., Bruton, G., & Li, W. (2010). Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 419–436.CrossRef
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 71–89.CrossRef
Mirvis, P., Herrera, M. E. B., Googins, B., & Albareda, L. (2016). Corporate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5014–5021.CrossRef
Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 571–601.CrossRef
Munilla, L., & Miles, M. (2005). The corporate social responsibility continuum as a component of stakeholder theory. Business and Society Review, 110(4), 371–387.CrossRef
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation (Vol. 24). The Yourng Foundation/NESTA.
Nicolopoulou, K., Karataş-Özkan, M., Vas, C., & Nouman, M. (2017). An incubation perspective on social innovation: The London Hub–a social incubator. R&D Management, 47(3), 368–384.CrossRef
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Oktemgil, M., & Greenley, G. (1997). Consequences of high and low adaptive capability in UK companies. European Journal of Marketing, 31(7), 445–466.CrossRef
Onsongo, E. (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship and social innovation at the base of the pyramid: The case of M-Pesa in Kenya. Industry and Innovation, 26(4), 369–390.CrossRef
Park, B. I., & Cave, A. H. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in international joint ventures: Empirical examinations in South Korea. International Business Review, 27(6), 1213–1228.CrossRef
Park, B. I., Chidlow, A., & Choi, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders influence on MNEs’ activities. International Business Review, 23(5), 966–980.CrossRef
Park, B. I., & Ghauri, P. N. (2015). Determinants influencing CSR practices in small and medium sized MNE subsidiaries: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 192–204.CrossRef
Park, B. I., & Xiao, S. S. (2021). Doing good by combating bad in the digital world: Institutional pressures, anti-corruption practices, and competitive implications of MNE foreign subsidiaries. Journal of Business Research, 137, 194–205.CrossRef
Park, S. H., Li, S., & Tse, D. K. (2006). Market liberalization and firm performance during China’s economic transition. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 127–147.CrossRef
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445.CrossRef
Peerally, J. A., De Fuentes, C., Santiago, F., & Zhao, S. (2022). The sustainability of multinational enterprises’ pandemic-induced social innovation approaches. Thunderbird International Business Review, 64(2), 115–124.CrossRef
Pel, B., Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Bauler, T., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2020). Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions. Research Policy, 49(8), 104080.CrossRef
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.CrossRef
Pfajfar, G., Shoham, A., Małecka, A., & Zalaznik, M. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact: Relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 143, 46–61.CrossRef
Phillips, W., Alexander, E. A., & Lee, H. (2019). Going it alone won’t work! The relational imperative for social innovation in social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 315–331.CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.CrossRef
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.CrossRef
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
Ramamurti, R. (2001). The obsolescing ‘bargaining model’? MNC-host developing country relations revisited. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 23–39.CrossRef
Rao-Nicholson, R., Vorley, T., & Khan, Z. (2017). Social innovation in emerging economies: A national systems of innovation based approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 228–237.CrossRef
Reimann, F., Ehrgott, M., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2012). Local stakeholders and local legitimacy: MNEs’ social strategies in emerging economies. Journal of International Management, 18(1), 1–17.CrossRef
Roh, T., Lee, K., & Yang, J. Y. (2021). How do intellectual property rights and government support drive a firm’s green innovation? The mediating role of open innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 128422.CrossRef
Roh, T., Noh, J., Oh, Y., & Park, K.-S. (2022a). Structural relationships of a firm’s green strategies for environmental performance: The roles of green supply chain management and green marketing innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 356, 131877.CrossRef
Roh, T., Yang, Y. S., Xiao, S., & Park, B. I. (2022b). What makes consumers trust and adopt fintech? An empirical investigation in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 24(1), 3–35.CrossRef
Rönkkö, M., & Ylitalo, J. (2011). PLS marker variable approach to diagnosing and controlling for method variance. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information System (ICIS 2011).
Rosca, E., Möllering, G., Rijal, A., & Bendul, J. C. (2019). Supply chain inclusion in base of the pyramid markets. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(5), 575–598.CrossRef
Rottig, D. (2016). Institutions and emerging markets: Effects and implications for multinational corporations. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(1), 2–17.CrossRef
Roy, A., Walters, P. G. P., & Luk, S. T. K. (2001). Chinese puzzles and paradoxes: Conducting business research in China. Journal of Business Research, 52(2), 203–210.CrossRef
Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 207–221.CrossRef
Saka-Helmhout, A., Chappin, M. M., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2021). Corporate social innovation in developing countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 181, 589–605.CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478.CrossRef
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 259–284.CrossRef
Segarra-Oña, M., Peiró-Signes, A., Albors-Garrigós, J., & Miguel-Molina, B. D. (2017). Testing the social innovation construct: An empirical approach to align socially oriented objectives, stakeholder engagement, and environmental sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(1), 15–27.CrossRef
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.CrossRef
Singh, J., de los Salmones-Sanchez, M. M. G., & del Bosque, I. R. (2008). Understanding corporate social responsibility and product perceptions in consumer markets: A cross-cultural evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 597–611.CrossRef
Sinha, M., & Sheth, J. (2018). Growing the pie in emerging markets: Marketing strategies for increasing the ratio of non-users to users. Journal of Business Research, 86, 217–224.CrossRef
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.CrossRef
Sousa, T., Soares, T., Pinson, P., Moret, F., Baroche, T., & Sorin, E. (2019). Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 367–378.CrossRef
Steinfield, L., & Holt, D. (2019). Toward a theory on the reproduction of social innovations in subsistence marketplaces. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(6), 764–799.CrossRef
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRef
Tian, Z., Wang, R., & Yang, W. (2011). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 197–212.CrossRef
Torres-Baumgarten, G., & Yucetepe, V. (2009). Multinational firms’ leadership role in corporate social responsibility in Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 217–224.CrossRef
Turker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189–204.CrossRef
Turker, D., & Vural, C. A. (2017). Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 98–113.CrossRef
UNCTAD. (2001). World investment report: Promoting linkages. United Nations.
UNCTAD. (2011). World investment report: Non-equity modes of international production and development. United Nations.
UNCTAD. (2021). World investment report: Investing in sustainable recovery. United Nations.
Valentinov, V. (2022). Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(1), 75–88.CrossRef
Varadarajan, R., & Kaul, R. (2018). Doing well by doing good innovations: Alleviation of social problems in emerging markets through corporate social innovations. Journal of Business Research, 86, 225–233.CrossRef
Vassallo, J. P., Prabhu, J. C., Banerjee, S., & Voola, R. (2019). The role of hybrid organizations in scaling social innovations in bottom-of-the-pyramid markets: Insights from microfinance in India. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(6), 744–763.CrossRef
Verwaal, E., Klein, M., & La Falce, J. (2022). Business model involvement, adaptive capacity, and the triple bottom line at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(3), 607–621.CrossRef
Waddock, S. A., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. B. (2002). Responsibility: The new business imperative. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(2), 132–148.CrossRef
Xiao, S. S., Jeong, I., Moon, J. J., Chung, C. C., & Chung, J. (2013). Internationalization and performance of firms in China: Moderating effects of governance structure and the degree of centralized control. Journal of International Management, 19(2), 118–137.CrossRef
Xiao, S. S., Lew, Y. K., & Park, B. I. (2020). International network searching, learning, and explorative capability: Small and medium-sized enterprises from China. Management International Review, 60(4), 597–621.CrossRef
Xiao, S. S., Lew, Y. K., & Park, B. I. (2021). International new product development performance, entrepreneurial capability, and network in high-tech ventures. Journal of Business Research, 124, 38–46.CrossRef
Xu, S., & Woo, D. (2023). Key players in corporate social responsibility (CSR) institutionalization: An analysis of multinational companies’ interorganizational positioning via CSR reports. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(1), 3–31.CrossRef
Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries: A stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 155–169.CrossRef
Yin, J., & Jamali, D. (2016). Strategic corporate social responsibility of multinational companies subsidiaries in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Long Range Planning, 49(5), 541–558.CrossRef
Zhao, M. (2012). CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 439–460.CrossRef
Zhao, M., Park, S. H., & Zhou, N. (2014). MNC strategy and social adaptation in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 842–861.CrossRef
Zhu, Q., & Lai, K.-H. (2019). Enhancing supply chain operations with extended corporate social responsibility practices by multinational enterprises: Social capital perspective from Chinese suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 1–12.CrossRef
Zhu, W., Su, S., & Shou, Z. (2017). Social ties and firm performance: The mediating effect of adaptive capability and supplier opportunism. Journal of Business Research, 78, 226–232.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
MNCs’ Social Innovation in Emerging Markets: A Stakeholder Perspective
verfasst von
Shufeng Xiao
Taewoo Roh
Pervez N. Ghauri
Moon Hwan Cho
Byung Il Park
Publikationsdatum
02.05.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Management International Review
Print ISSN: 0938-8249
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-8901
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-024-00537-5

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise