Structural Means for Fire-Safe Wooden Façade Design

This article describes structural measures used for fire-safe wooden façades. In this context, the façade refers to the building envelope. This does not include the exterior wall, which separates the interior space of a building from the surroundings. Figure 1 represents the façade and substructure and the actual external wall (gray).

Wooden façades can be used in various constructive designs, as shown in Fig. 1.

In most cases, wooden façades are designed as rear-ventilated façades by virtue of the requirements for weather and moisture protection [5]. This constructive design helps to remove moisture that has penetrated from the outside and condensation that has formed, which ensures durability [6, 7]. Regarding ventilated façades, a distinction is made between fully rear-ventilated façade claddings (open at the top and bottom) and merely partially rear-ventilated façade claddings, as shown in Fig. 1. Non-rear-ventilated wooden façade claddings are less common because of the aforementioned durability aspects.

However, rear-ventilated façade claddings represent the most critical case with respect to the fire safety of wooden façades. In comparison to non-combustible ventilated façades [8], the existence of a rear-ventilated void cavity and the presence of wood as combustible material can greatly increase the propagation of fire within the ventilated cavity [9‐11]. Therefore, the focus of this study is on the fire safety of wooden claddings in rear-ventilated façade systems.

Another important influencing factor is the various types of cladding used in rear-ventilated wooden façades. Table 6 shows the common types of cladding typically used in practice. The types shown in Table 6 range from closed façades (closed façade surface, e.g., wood-based panels) to open designed façades (no closed façade surface, e.g., open cladding). Figures 23 and 24 of the appendix show actual examples.

Fully rear-ventilated, partially rear-ventilated, and non-ventilated wooden façades have been used for some time, even on taller buildings. In this case, special constructive fire protection measures must be taken in order to prevent or limit the contribution of the façade cladding to fire spreading from story to story. Within this context, ventilated wooden façades in particular represent the most critical design case. Studies that directly compared non-ventilated and ventilated wooden façades concluded that wooden claddings with rear-ventilated cavities released almost twice as much energy as wooden façade claddings without rear-ventilated cavities, thus resulting in more severe flame formation and accelerated fire spread [9, 11, 12].

Numerous research projects have identified fire stops as essential design measures in limiting the spread of fire on wooden façades to an acceptable level [13‐20].

Hietaniemi et al. [11] have summarized the results of several studies. When there are fire stops in the rear-ventilated cavity, the fire propagation speed is halved to about 20 cm/min from the speed of 40 cm/min, which corresponds to an open fully rear-ventilated cavity [11, 12].

The spread of fire on wooden façades can be effectively limited by means of horizontal fire stops (projections) which break the continuous wooden cladding and ventilation cavity in separate areas. Typically, horizontal fire stops (usually made of steel sheet, wood, or mineral building materials—as shown in Fig. 2) are executed on each story at the level of the floor slabs and over the entire façade. The dimensions and design of the horizontal projection in front of the façade cladding primarily depend on the type of façade cladding used (as shown in Table 6) [13, 14].

The spread of fire in interior corners of wooden façades should be limited by special measures, such as horizontal fire stops with a larger horizontal projection in front of the façade cladding, or by using non-combustible façade claddings in the area of the interior corners [13, 14].

Another alternative for preventing the spread of fire at the façade is to use projecting non-combustible panels or slabs above openings. These projections deflect the fire plume away from the façade [21‐24]. This solution is often used in high-rise buildings [25] but restricts the architectural design options for the façade.

The fire safety of wooden façades was investigated by the Swiss Lignum research group as part of an experimental campaign in the early 2000s.

33 façade fire tests using various wooden façade claddings and different structural fire protection measures were conducted at MFPA in Leipzig, Germany, but the results were never fully published. The face of the test stand had a height of 8.3 m and a width of 3.3 m and was made of masonry. The influence of an interior corner was investigated via four tests. In the MFPA set-up, the main face of the test stand had a width of 2.4 m and the return wall (wing) had a width of 1.4 m. The combustion chamber was located at the bottom of the main wing. A 50 kg wooden crib was used as the fire load in 27 of the tests, and a 25 kg wooden crib in two of the tests. The 25 kg wooden cribs were used in conjunction with a corner application of the walls.

In addition, six real-scale fire experiments were performed in a vacant building in Merkers, Germany which was lined with wooden façade claddings (about 700 m²). The experiments sought to validate the results of the aforementioned fire tests on an actual building using realistic fire loads [13]. An experiment with a fire source outside of the building in front the façade (100 kg wood crib), a balcony fire experiment (150 kg wood crib), and four compartment fires with wooden cribs (fuel load density 600 MJ/m² and 800 MJ/m² respectively) were conducted.

These real-scale fire experiments confirmed that the various structural measures investigated in the 33 fire tests that effectively limit the spread of fire can also be applied to actual buildings. It was thus concluded that the overall findings from the façade tests could be transferred to real buildings for further application. It should be noted, however, that only fire stops made of steel sheet were used in the real-scale fire experiments.

Following evaluation and interpretation of the results, the structural fire safety measures were published in [13]. An overview of the findings is summarized in Table 1 for buildings of medium height (> 11 m; ≤ 30 m total height).

Specific regulations are presented herein along with the full documentation for façades with window bands, façades with single balconies in timber construction, and for other construction types [13].

Design solutions for the interior corners of façades with wooden claddings are also presented in [13]. In these areas, the overhang of the horizontal fire stop is recommended to be at least twice the projection of the standard case, which is typically in the range of 150 mm–300 mm.

The wooden façades investigated were extinguished after an average time of 24 min. The basis for this approach was the assumption in [26], in which it was interpreted that the fire service arrives on side after a period of 15 min, so the spread of fire on the façade over a longer period need not be investigated. For this reason, the fire was always extinguished after 15 or 20 min, but a longer exposure time was also considered in individual cases [13]. Figure 3 shows the relevant test durations after which the façades were extinguished; only fire tests on façades with wooden claddings are shown.

Based on the results of the Lignum fire tests, the fire behavior of wooden façades can be reliably assessed up to a fire duration of about 20 min. No statements can be made about the behavior of wooden façades exposed to fire for longer durations. Therefore, further investigations were needed regarding whether the design measures developed in [13] can effectively limit the spread of fire in the event of longer fire exposures. A study of wooden façades in Sweden found that, in wooden façades with a rear-ventilated cavity, the spread of fire in the rear ventilation cavity increases sharply from 10 min onwards. This result supports the aforementioned concern [9].

Based on the Swiss results, an Austrian research team investigated five further wooden façade systems and fire stops on a façade test stand in accordance with ÖNORM B 3800-5 [16, 27]. In summary, the results reflected the following findings [14] (Table 2).

Five variations of a fire-safe design are presented for interior corners. Depending on the type of cladding and the distances to window openings, these show projections for horizontal fire stops of 100 mm–300 mm in the interior corner.

According to the Austrian design rules, it is permitted to omit fire stops between the penultimate story and the last story [14].

A French research team also investigated the behavior of wooden façades [17‐20] in the case of fire. The investigations in France were the basis for the French façade guide for wooden façades [19]. In comparative studies, it was shown that fire stops delay the temperature increase into the rear-ventilation cavity for almost 10 min [18]. The specifications from [19] are summarized below. The guideline requires mounting the fire stops to the structural wall with a fixation spacing of no greater than 500 mm (Table 3).

The aim of the testing was to investigate the spread of fire on wooden façades outside the primary fire plume of the window opening. Guidance on the design and choice of relevant fire stops was furthermore derived from the tests.

The burning of the wooden façade in the primary fire area is unavoidable and must therefore be accepted. The vertical spread of fire must nevertheless be limited. There should be no further uncontrolled fire spread outside of the flame from the primary fire.

Depending on the flame height, the flames can overrun several fire stops [28]. In typical room fires, as evidenced by studies of real fire incidents and fire tests, average flame heights of between 2.0 m and 4.5 m and flame peaks up to 6.0 m outside the opening can be expected. This depends on the fuel load, room geometry, ventilation conditions, opening geometry, and wind conditions [24, 29, 30]. The fire stop above the fire plume represents the relevant measure for limiting the spread of fire, as shown in Fig. 4.

Given that the burning of the wooden façade in the primary fire area is unavoidable, the size of the resulting flame from an internal fire (e.g., from a window opening in a compartment fire) or an external fire (e.g., from a fire that occurs outside of the building in front of the façade) played no role in this investigation. For both scenarios, the governing factor is the fire propagation along the wooden façade above the primary flame. The aim was to obtain approaches for evaluating the fire stop above the primary flame.

Crucial for the following investigation is the degree of effectiveness of the constructive fire stops and protection measures. Of importance are:

The primary focus herein is on the vertical spread of fire, because the Swiss studies have already shown that the horizontal spread of fire occurs only to a very small extent at wooden façades [13].

For reasons of repeatability and reproducibility, the tests were performed on a façade test stand based on German standard DIN 4102-20 [31]. This test method considers a fire exposure via a combustion chamber with a 30 kg wooden crib, as shown in Fig. 5. Although the thermal exposure of a 30 kg wooden crib is not entirely equivalent to that of a flame coming from a window opening in a fully developed compartment fire, a similar thermal exposure occurs at the façade in the area of the flame tip and above the lintel of the opening [28, 29]. For this reason, the test method was suitable for investigating fire propagation outside the primary fire plume at the flame tip.

A two-layer lining of 18 mm gypsum boards type F was used as the exterior face of the test stand, and the respective façade claddings being tested were mounted upon it. The dimensions of the test stand and the position of the fire stops are shown in Fig. 5. To exclude an early failure of the fire stops, the fixation of any fire stop was anchored into the structural timber elements behind the gypsum lining [32].

As a fire load, 30 (± 1.5) kg of wooden cribs made of planed spruce timber with a density of 475 (± 25) kg/m³ and a wood moisture content of 12.4% were arranged in the form of 40 (± 2) × 40 (± 2) × 500 (± 10) mm sticks in staggered layers with a crosswise arrangement (90°) at a wood-to-air ratio of 1:1 in the combustion chamber. The base area of the wooden cribs was 500 × 500 mm.

The combustion chamber (1.0 m wide and 0.8 m deep) was built from aerated concrete blocks, and a rectangular opening with dimensions 300 × 250 mm (w × h) corresponding to an area of 0.075 m² was arranged at the backside for a mechanical ventilation of the crib, as shown in Fig. 5.

Due to the standardized test set-up, only façade fires spreading over one and a half stories can be investigated. It is known from studies on parallel room fires over two superimposed stories that the plume and the flame height increase [33, 34]. The same phenomenon can be expected in the case of a façade fire over several stories. In view of the unpublished test reports from Switzerland, it can be seen that, in the case of a fire spreading over the fire stops, parts of the wooden facade of the story below are already burned down. This leads to the conclusion that the test method was adequate for a basic investigation.

16 sheathed thermocouples of type K according to EN 60584-1 [35] with an outer diameter of 3 mm were arranged on the test rig for temperature measurement, as shown in Fig. 5. The thermocouples were guided through a hole from the rear of the test stand onto the façade and fixed either in the rear ventilation cavity or on the surface of the façade by means of wire. They were positioned centrally in the rear-ventilated void cavity or at a distance of 20 mm from the façade cladding [32]. Figures 5 and 6 show the positions of the thermocouples.

All sheathed thermocouples were orientated horizontally along the façade at ≥ 130 mm parallel to the isotherm in order to enable a correct temperature measurement.

In addition, all tests were recorded using a video camera and thermal imaging camera.

The individual experimental set-ups are shown in Table 4.

The tests were performed on a wind-protected outdoor test stand. The corresponding weather data are provided in Table 7 of the appendix.

An overpressure ventilation in the combustion chamber was enabled by a fan located at the rear side and started 120 s after ignition.

The flame spread over the individual fire stops was reported with an indication of the time based on the observations and measurements. The tests were stopped when the second fire stop was exceeded or the flames reached the upper end of the test stand.

As per Sect. 3.4, only one fire stop at a height of 3 m from the lower edge of the test stand was installed. This fire stop was exceeded after 40:00 min and the test ended after 47:00 min. No horizontal fire spread was observed during the test, as shown in Fig. 12. A self-extinction did not occur.

The first charring above the first fire stop resulting from the flames coming from the combustion chamber was detected after 02:00 min, but the façade above the first fire stop did not exhibit flaming combustion. The test was stopped after 46:30 min; self-extinction occurred. A horizontal spread of fire and charring of the façade cladding was only detected below the first fire stop due to the horizontal deflection of the flames, as shown in Fig. 13.

After 01:40 min in Test 3, it was apparent that the first fire stop (overhanging wooden board) could no longer exclude a burning of the wooden cladding above the fire stop for the flame coming from the combustion chamber. Burning above the second fire stop was observed after 27:30 min. The test was terminated after 30:00 min because the flames reached the upper edge of the test stand. No self-extinction occurred. An obvious horizontal fire spread was observed directly in the area of each of the wooden fire stops, as shown in Fig. 14.

In Test 4, with a closed rear-ventilated cavity at the top end of each story, the first fire stop exhibited no protection ability after only 01:00 min, and the second fire stop was no longer able to prevent burning of the wooden cladding above the fire stop after 46:30 min. The test was stopped after 50:00 min. Self-extinction did not occur. No horizontal spread of fire was detected, as shown in Fig. 15.

The large overhang of the steel sheet fire stop in Test 5 prevented the spread of fire above the first fire stop for up to 27:00 min, as shown in Fig. 26 of the appendix. The fire spread above the first fire stop was caused by a gap between the steel sheet fire stop and the wall, through which hot gases rose, and by a deformation/lifting of the steel sheet fire stop in the direction of the wooden façade. Due to the massive burning of the façade cladding, the second fire stop was first spilled by the fire in the corner area after 39:30 min. The test was stopped after 42:30 min. Self-extinction did not occur. Horizontal fire spread was observed in the entire façade area above the first fire stop, as shown in Fig. 16.

The aim of this study was to define constructive measures that can prevent or limit the spread of fire on the wooden façade outside the primary flame area without any premature intervention by fire services. Furthermore, measures which able to lead to a self-extinction in consideration of the investigated scenarios were also to be identified.

The design measures described in the following sections can be derived in consideration of the experimental investigations in Sect. 2 and the test conducted in Sect. 3.

Figure 17 shows the typical structure of a ventilated wooden façade. Following the numbering shown in Fig. 17, the respective design principles for these components are described below.

The outer surface of the external wall (No. 1 in Fig. 17) should be made of non-combustible building materials. The major influence of the combustibility of the outer face of the wall forming the inner boundary of the ventilation cavity was already confirmed in the French investigations [18]. The rear-ventilated void cavity is formed by the wooden façade on one side and by the outer surface of the exterior wall on the other. If both surfaces are made of combustible materials, the fire spread will spread much faster within the void cavity and thus reach greater heights more quickly. A direct comparison of the previously described Test 1 and an unpublished industrial test [41] with a similar set-up but using wood fiberboard as the outer surface of the exterior wall also clearly shows this significant influence, as shown in Fig. 18. It should be noted that the measuring point for the variant with wood fiberboard was located 650 mm higher. Much higher temperatures occurred even though the measuring point for the variant with wood fiberboard was farther away from the combustion chamber.

No further fire stops were arranged during the test with the wood fiberboard, so the test had to be stopped after only 31 min, after which the flames had reached the upper end of the test stand.

For light timber frame or mass timber structures, it is recommended to use a layer of 2 × 12.5 mm or 1 × 18 mm gypsum plasterboard type F or gypsum fiberboard as the outer face of the external wall elements. Beyond the positive influence on the façade, such layers also provide 30 min of encapsulation for the wall elements behind [42].

The typical foils or membranes less than 0.5 mm thick that are required for weather protection or moisture control on top of the outer gypsum layer (as shown in Fig. 17) have no negative impact on the aforementioned behavior and, due to the low total heat of combustion, they make no noteworthy contribution to the spread of fire inside the ventilation cavity.

In view of the available test reports listed in Sect. 2.4 and the findings obtained in our own investigation, it can be concluded that the fire behavior of a wooden façade is strongly dependent on the type of cladding and its application. This means that the type of façade in combination with the design of the substructure and ventilation cavity has a great influence on the spread of fire along the façade and, therefore, on the performance of fire stops.

In general, it was seen that a closed façade cladding design and reducing the depth of the rear-ventilation cavity resulted in improved façade performance with regard to fire spread. It can thus be stated that the types of façade claddings listed in Table 6—from top to bottom—should be assessed more critically from a fire safety point of view. This ranking also applies to the horizontal spread of fire. Looking at Table 5, it can be stated that a horizontal fire spread outside the fire stops was only observed for open façade claddings.

A panel cladding designed as a completely closed system represents the best design with regard to vertical and horizontal fire spread, and a vertical open cladding with four-sided fire exposure at the cladding thus represents the worst variant.

The spread of fire on open claddings exposed to fire on four sides is well illustrated by the experiments regarding vertical and horizontal fire propagation in [43]. The horizontal fire spread increased significantly at a smaller spacing. However, the vertical fire spread was significantly greater than the horizontal in all of the investigational set-ups.

The decisive factor with respect to the spread of fire is the degree of the thermal induced formation of gaps for the façade cladding. In all of the tests conducted, faster fire spread was observed after the first gaps appeared in the cladding towards the rear-ventilation cavity in the area of the primary flame, because the cladding was exposed to fire on two sides and sufficient oxygen was available. Regarding to the overall fire behavior, form-fit claddings with, e.g., tongue-and-groove joints which prevent continuous gaps for a longer fire duration typically behave better than force-fit claddings, especially when thermal deformation and shrinkage are taken into account. The thickness of the cladding is an essential factor for the time at which continuing gaps in the façade cladding over its entire surface occur. It has already been shown in other studies that the increase in the thickness of the wooden cladding led to a temporary reduction in the heat release [17]. Considering the tests performed tests and the test results, claddings with a nominal thickness of ≥ 21 mm are recommended. Local reductions can be tolerated, but the thickness should not be less than 12 mm. Furthermore, the wooden cladding should have a minimum density of 350 kg/m³.

During the tests, it was also observed that vertically oriented cladding led to a faster and more severe vertical fire spread than a horizontally oriented cladding. This outcome can be ascribed to two causes in particular. On the one hand, the burning rate of wood in the direction of the grain can be assumed to be twice as high as that perpendicular to the grain [44] and, on the other hand, the additional substructure (crosswise lathing) in conjunction with the increased ventilated void cavity also contributes to a faster and a more intensive spread of fire. The reason for this is that cross-lathing is typically used for vertically arranged wooden cladding. This means that both vertical and horizontal battens are arranged underneath the cladding (as shown in Fig. 27 of the appendix), thus increasing the ventilation cavity to twice the size. The larger cavity and three-sided fire exposure on the vertically running lathing contributes to a faster spread of fire in the vertical direction and to a more severe exposure at horizontal fire stops.

Based on the tests performed, the ventilation cavity should be limited to a maximum depth of 50 mm (cross-lathing with max. 2 × 25 mm). In the case of cross lathing, the ventilation cavity should be closed at horizontal intervals of no more than 5 m by doubling up the vertical battening, as shown in Fig. 19.

Furthermore, the ventilation cavity should be fully blocked (width ≥ 50 mm) at the lateral ends of the façade and the internal corners, as shown in Fig. 20.

Another positive measure gained from the test regarded the reveal lining around the window opening and the diagonally fixed rain deflector above the window. Both prevented a direct spread of fire into the ventilated void cavity, as shown in Fig. 28 of the appendix.

It should also be noted that, after the end of the test, the façade fires were able to be extinguished quickly and with little water. No special tactics or equipment was needed. This confirms the comparative studies on extinguishing techniques on wooden façades in [45].

The investigations in Sect. 2.3 show that partially rear-ventilated façades perform better than fully rear-ventilated façades with respect to fire spread [11, 12]. This was also proven as part of the test series presented earlier. The blocking of the rear-ventilation cavity by timber battens is an effective means of slowing down the spread of fire along wooden façades. However, self-extinction or a reduction of the spread of fire across a story level cannot be achieved using this structural measure alone. Overhanging fire stops arranged at the floor level are more suitable with respect to the latter two requirements. As per the Swiss and Austrian guidance documents [13, 14], fire stops made of steel sheet, timber with sheet metal covering, and mineral-bonded boards are recommended as horizontal fire stops. In the current test series, the positive effect of horizontal steel sheets as fire stops was also confirmed over a longer test period. However, the effect of common wooden boards as horizontal fire stops (Test 3) could not be confirmed for a longer test period as part of this test series.

After a certain period, the wooden fire stops contributed to the spread of fire due to burning themselves and becoming charred through, but they also enlarged the horizontal affected area exposed by the flames, as shown in Fig. 14 in Test 3. Considering the tests performed, combustible fire stops, even those with sheet metal support, are not an effective means of preventing the spread of fire over a longer period of time.

Fire stops made of mineral-bonded boards were not explicitly investigated in the full-scale tests. However, challenges surrounding the adequate fixation of the fire stops were identified in model set-ups [32].

Composite fire stops made of steel sheets and mineral-based boards might offer advantages in terms of thermal expansion effects or fixation, but the behavior of such composite fire stops requires further investigation.

Effective fire stops should be made of steel sheets with a thickness ≥ 2 mm. The fire stops must tightly fixed to the non-combustible substructure, as shown in Sect. 5.2, and the fasteners (screws d ≥ 5.0 mm) should be anchored at least 35 mm into the load-bearing structure of the wall behind, as shown in Fig. 29 of the appendix.

As mentioned in Sect. 5.3, varying fire exposure may occur on the fire stops, depending on the type of façade cladding. The three relevant influencing factors are the design of the façade cladding, the design of the substructure, and the depth of the ventilation cavity. Based on the available information in the literature and the tests performed, the overhang depth × (as shown in Fig. 17 and provided in Table 6) are recommended. The objective was to prevent a spill by the flames of the relevant fire stop above the primary flame for a period of > 30 min. Such behavior offers fire services in particular a chance to fight the façade fire after the executing their primary measures (e.g., occupant rescue). The most important effect on the horizontal fire stop is not the primary flame from the window opening itself, but rather the extensive burning of the façade cladding in the relevant story, as is obvious from Test 5. In principle, self-extinction can also be expected with these designs after the cladding below the relevant fire stop has charred completely. However, further tests which also take into account influencing factors like wind must be performed in order to confirm this point conclusively.

Interior corners have a noticeable influence on the flame height and the resulting temperatures in façade fires. This fact has already been demonstrated in a variety of studies [46]. These effects, which are particularly prominent for combustible wooden façades, must be considered when designing fire stops in interior corners. Based on the tests conducted and the information available from the literature, Table 6 also provides the overhang depth x (according to Fig. 17) for interior corners. The area of the increased overhang in interior corners should be at least 1.0 m to each side, as shown in Fig. 22.

During the observations for Test 5, it became obvious that fire spread across the horizontal fire stop may occur even though no direct exposure by flames exists, as shown in Figs. 16 and 26 of the appendix. This fact can be explained by three factors. On the one hand, the steel fire stops expanded under the thermal exposure, which consequently led to a joint opening in between the screwed spots of the fire stop, as shown in Fig. 21. The thermal exposure on the above structural timber elements (timber battens and cladding) increased through these gaps. Screw spacings of 300–400 mm were used In the five tests. Taking into account the temperature exposure according to Sect. 4 of about 800 °C and considering an expansion coefficient for steel of 11 × 10^–6 K⁻¹ obtains an approximate thermal expansion in one dimension for a 400 mm spacing of 3.52 mm [47]. This thermal expansion would, approximately, lead to a gap of about 27 mm depth between the steel sheet and the outer wall face, which was confirmed by the test evaluation. Figure 21 shows the fire stop after the test, with reduced deformation but with a gap still present. In practice, fixation distances of ≤ 200 mm are recommended based on the test findings. In addition, in consideration of the effect of thermal expansion and weather resistance, the fire stops should have 20 mm slotted holes into which fasteners are inserted centrally. Furthermore, panel joints behind the fire stops should be avoided, filled, or calked.

The second factor regarding fire propagation across fire stops can also be attributed to the effect of thermal deformation and the upwards lifting of the steel sheet fire stops. During Test 5, it was observed that the fire stop, which was subjected to high fire exposure, lifted upward and moved closer to the timber lathing and the cladding above. The reduced distance and the high temperatures of the steel sheet fire stops caused a spread of fire to the wooden cladding and the timber lathing, as shown in Fig. 30 of the appendix. To counteract this effect, substructures and other combustible components should be arranged at a distance of h ≥ 20 mm (Fig. 17) to the steel sheet fire stops.

The third factor regarding fire spread without direct fire exposure at the fire stops can be the result of insufficient joint overlapping along the longitudinal direction of the fire stops and in the corners. Taking into account the thermal expansion, deflections and other deformations, the tests showed that a longitudinal overlap of 50 mm is not sufficient in all cases. For this reason, longitudinal joints in steel sheet fire stops should be joined mechanically or by welding in a friction-locked and jointless manner, or they should be designed with a joint overlap of at least 300 mm. In the area of both sides of interior corners, the fire stops with a length of ≥ 1.0 m should have the aforementioned friction-locked jointless connections, as shown in Fig. 22.